...individual and exempting them (unless otherwise specially provided) from individual liability. The corporation must dwell in the place of its creation,...cannot migrate to another sovereignty (Bank of Augusta rs. Earle). Having no absolute right of recognition in other States, but depending for such recognition...

...unless prohibited by local laws. Such has been for a long time the settled doctrine of this court It must dwell in the place of its creation and cannot migrate to another sovereignty." It may be true that the word " resident " as used in the Code (§ 636), relating to attachments, and...

...Bank of Augusta v. Earle,1 is a leading case in point; and it was there said by Chief Justice Taney, that a corporation " must dwell in the place of its creation and can not migrate to another sovereignty;" but that its residence in one State creates no insuperable...

...a foreign corporation, it has been decided that it is not liable to suit upon a personal demand. 2 "The principle that a corporation must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot, as said by Mr. Chief Justice Taney, migrate to another sovereignty, coupled with the doctrine that...

...longer obligatory, the corporation can have no existVOI-. CXLV — 29 Opinion of the Court. ence. It must dwell in the place of its. creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. But although it must live and have its being in that State only, yet it does not by any means follow...

...citizenship by doing business in another state: Baltimore etc. R. 11. Co. v. Koonli, 104 US 5. " It must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot...migrate to another sovereignty ": Bank of Augusta v. Earlt. 13 Pet. 520. Yet different charters for the same general business may be granted by different...

...ordinary business there. 2 The much quoted dictum of CHIEF JUSTICE TANEY, in Bank of Augusta v. Earle,' that a corporation "must dwell in the place of its...creation and cannot migrate to another sovereignty." can have no reference to such a migration as this. It is simply a rhetorical statement of the perfectly...

...the limits of the sovereignty when created. As said by this Court in Bank of Augusta vs. Earle, "It must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty." The recognition of its existence even by other States, and the enforcement of its contracts made therein,...

...property in this state is equally untenable. Though it was said in Dank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Pet 584, that a corporation "must dwell in the place of its...creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty," still it was there held that it did not follow that it could not do business in other jurisdictions....

...therein: Aipintoall v. Ohio tie, KB Co., 20 frul. 492; 83 Am. Dec. 329, and note. A corporation mutt dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty: Baltimore etc. RR Co. v. Glenn, 28 Md. 287; 92 Am. Dec. 688; Clark i. Bant, 10 Ark. 616; 52 Am. Dec....