Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

arts is to supply the natural imperfection of things, and often to gratify the mind by realizing and embodying what never existed but in the imagination.

It is allowed on all hands, that facts and events, however they may bind the historian, have no dominion over the poet or the painter. With us, history is made to bend and conform to this great idea of art. And why? Because these arts, in their highest province, are not addressed to the gross senses; but to the desires of the mind, to that spark of divinity which we have within, impatient of being circumscribed and pent up by the world which is about us. Just so much as our art has of this, just so much of dignity, I had almost said of divinity, it exhibits; and those of our artists who possessed this mark of distinction in the highest degree, acquired from thence the glorious appellation of Divine.

DISCOURSE XIV.

[DELIVERED ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE PRIZES, DECEMBER 10TH, 1788.]

CHARACTER OF GAINSBOROUGH-HIS EXCELLENCIES AND DEFECTS.

GENTLEMEN,

In the study of our art, as in the study of all arts, something is the result of our own observation of Nature; something, and that not a little, the effect of the example of those who have studied the same Nature before us, and who have cultivated before us the same art, with diligence and success. The less we confine ourselves in the choice of those examples, the more advantage we shall derive from them, and the nearer we shall bring our performances to a correspendence with nature and the great general rules of art. When we draw our When we draw our examples from remote and revered antiquity,—with some advantage undoubtedly in that selection,—

As this discourse applies principally to landscape painting, it may be observed, that the student who is to follow this branch of the art, has less business within the walls of an academy than he who is devoted to any other department; beyond the mere learning to draw correctly, he will gain little insight into those objects upon which his pencil is to be employed. Grounding his studies in copying or contemplating the works of his predecessors, the great book of Nature is the source from which he must make his sketches; and as pictures of this class are more addressed to the eye than historical works, his eye ought to be imbued and saturated with the vivid impressions of natural imagery. In this, as in every other branch, there is a certain regulation necessary to acquire the art of representation; for though Nature appears to throw about her materials as if in sport, yet this careless look cannot be imitated by painting with the palette-knife, or flirting the colours from the brush: faithful and laborious copying is necessary in the outset both from Nature and the best pictures. A painting is a complete whole, which is seldom the case in Nature; therefore, a knowledge of what to add, or what to take away, can only be learned from the compositions of our predecessors.

we subject ourselves to some inconveniences. We We may suffer ourselves to be too much led away by great names, and to be too much subdued by overbearing authority. Our learning, in that case, is not so much an exercise of our judgment, as a proof of our docility. We find ourselves, perhaps, too much overshadowed; and the character of our pursuits is rather distinguished by the tameness of the follower, than animated by the spirit of emulation. It is sometimes of service, that our examples should be near us; and such as raise a reverence, sufficient to induce us carefully to observe them, yet not so great as to prevent us from engaging with them in something like a generous contention.

We have lately lost Mr. Gainsborough, one of the greatest ornaments of our Academy. It is not our business here, to make panegyrics on the living, or even on the dead, who were of our body. The praise of the former, might bear appearance of adulation; and the latter, of untimely justice; perhaps, of envy to those whom we have still the happiness to enjoy, by an oblique suggestion of invidious comparisons. In discoursing, therefore, on the talents of the late Mr. Gainsborough, my object is, not so much to praise or to blame him, as to draw from his excellencies and defects, matter of instruction to the students in our academy. If ever this nation should produce genius sufficient to acquire to us the honourable distinction of an English School, the name of Gainsborough will be transmitted to posterity, in the history of the art, among the very first of that rising name. That our reputation in the arts is now only rising, must be acknowledged; and we must expect our advances to be attended with old prejudices, as adversaries, and not as supporters; standing in this respect, in a very different situation from the late artists of the Roman School, to whose reputation ancient prejudices have certainly contributed : the way was prepared for them, and they may be said rather to have lived in the reputation of their country, than to have contributed to it; whilst whatever celebrity is obtained by English artists, can arise only from the operation of a fair and true comparison. And when they communicate to their country a share of their reputation, it is a portion of fame not bor

I I

rowed from others, but solely acquired by their own labour and talents. As Italy has, undoubtedly, a prescriptive right to an administration bordering on prejudice, as a soil peculiarly adapted, congenial, and, we may add, destined to the production of men of great genius in our art, we may not unreasonably suspect that a portion of the great fame of some of their late artists has been owing to the general readiness and disposition of mankind, to acquiesce in their original prepossessions in favour of the productions of the Roman School.

On this ground, however unsafe, I will venture to prophesy, that two of the last distinguished painters of that country, I mean Pompeio Battoni and Raffaelle Mengs, however great their names may at present sound in our ears, will very soon fall into the rank of Imperiale, Sebastian Concha, Placido Constanza, Masuccio, and the rest of their immediate predecessors; whose names, though equally renowned in their lifetime, are now fallen into what is little short of total oblivion. I do not say that those painters were not superior to the artist I allude to, and whose loss we lament, in a certain routine of practice, which, to the eyes of common observers, has the air of a learned composition, and bears a sort of superficial resemblance to the manner of the great men who went before them. I know this perfectly well, but I know likewise, that a man, looking for real and lasting reputation, must unlearn much of the common-place method so observable in the works of the artists whom I have named. For my own part, I confess, I take more interest in, and am more captivated

When a frieze that shall represent the English School is undertaken, the figures of Wilson and Gainsborough will stand out in high relief, while an indented line in the plaster will be sufficient to indicate the situation of the Smiths, Barretts, and Penneys, who lay like logs in the stream and dammed up and turned aside the patronage of the country. The encouragement given to portraiture has continued in one uninterrupted channel from the time of Holbein to our own, which has rendered this department more strikingly excellent; whereas the period from these founders of the English School of landscape painting, till lately, has been a continual struggle for existence: the old Italian, Flemish, and Dutch pictures having been thrust forward, to the exclusion of British genius. The general taste consequent upon such introduction is now, however, working in its favour; and the long neglected works of Wilson and Gainsborough are collected at the highest prices, as models of excellence for the example of future generations.

with the powerful impression of nature, which Gainsborough exhibited in his portraits and in his landscapes, and the interesting simplicity and elegance of his little ordinary beggar-children, than with any of the works of that school, since the time of Andrea Sacchi, or perhaps we may say Carlo Maratti; two painters, who may truly be said to be Ultimi Roma

norum.

I am well aware how much I lay myself open to the censure and ridicule of the academical professors of other nations, in preferring the humble attempts of Gainsborough to the works of those regular graduates in the great historical style. But we have the sanction of all mankind in preferring genius in a lower rank of art, to feebleness and insipidity in the highest.

It would not be to the present purpose, even if I had the means and materials, which I have not, to enter into the private life of Mr. Gainsborough. The history of his gradual advancement, and the means by which he acquired such excellence in his art, would come nearer to our purposes and wishes, if it were by any means attainable; but the slow progress of advancement is in general imperceptible to the man himself who makes it; it is the consequence of an accumulation of various ideas which his mind has received, he does not perhaps know how or when. Sometimes, indeed, it happens, that he may be able to mark the time when from the sight of a picture, a passage in an author, or a hint in conversation, he has received, as it were, some new and guiding light, something like inspiration, by which his mind has been expanded; and is morally sure that his whole life and conduct have been affected by that accidental circumstance. Such interesting accounts we may, however, sometimes obtain from a man who has acquired an uncommon habit of self-examination, and has attended to the progress of his own improvement.

It may not be improper to make mention of some of the customs and habits of this extraordinary man; points which come more within the reach of an observer; I however mean such only as are connected with his art, and indeed were, as I apprehend, the causes of his arriving to that

« AnteriorContinuar »