No. 96. WEDNESDAY, JULY 1, 1713.* Cuncti adsint, meritæque exspectent præmia palmæ. VIRG. Æn. v. 70. Let all be present at the games prepar'd; DRYDEN. THERE is no maxim in politics more indisputable, than that a nation should have many honours in reserve for those who do national services. This raises emulation, cherishes public merit, and inspires every one with an ambition which promotes the good of his country. The less expensive these honours are to the public the more still do they turn to its advantage. The Romans abounded with these little honorary rewards, that without conferring wealth or riches, gave only place and distinction to the person who received them. An oaken garland to be worn on festivals and public ceremonies, was the glorious recompence of one who had covered a citizen in battle. A soldier would not only venture his life for a mural crown, but think the most hazardous enterprize sufficiently repaid by so noble a donation. But among all honorary rewards which are neither dangerous nor detrimental to the donor, I remember none so remarkable as the titles which are bestowed by the emperor of China. These are never given to any subject, says monsieur le Comte, till the subject is dead. If he has pleased his emperor to the * ADDISON'S. P Pere le Compte, or Comte, a Jesuit missionary, published his remarks on China in the French language, under the title of Nouveaux Memoires sur l'état present de la Chine. The edition of Amsterdam in 1698, is în 2 vols. 8vo.; that of Paris in 1701, is in 3 vols. Of the English translation there are two editions in 8vo.; the last is in 1757. See Spect. No. 189. last, he is called in all public memorials by the title which the emperor confers on him after his death, and his children take their rank accordingly. This keeps the ambitious subject in a perpetual dependence, making him always vigilant and active, and in every thing conformable to the will of his sovereign. There are no honorary rewards among us, which are more esteemed by the person who receives them, and are cheaper to the prince, than the giving of medals. But there is something in the modern manner of celebrating a great action in medals, which makes such a reward much less valuable than it was among the Romans. There is generally but one coin stamped up on the occasion which is made a present to the person who is celebrated on it. By this means his whole fame is in his own custody. The applause that is bestowed upon him is too much limited and confined. He is in possession of an honour which the world perhaps knows nothing of. He may be a great man in his own family; his wife and children may see the monument of an exploit, which the public in a little time is a stranger to. The Romans took a quite different method in this particular. Their medals were their current money. When an action deserved to be recorded on coin, it was stamped perhaps upon an hundred thousand pieces of money like our shillings, or halfpence, which were issued out of the mint, and became current. This method published every noble action to advantage, and in a short space of time spread through the whole Roman empire. The Romans were so careful to preserve the memory of great events upon their coins, that when any particular piece of money grew very scarce, it was often re-coined by a succeeding emperor, many years after the death of the emperor to whose honour it was first struck. A friend of mine drew up a project of this kind during the late ministry, which would then have been put in execution had it not been too busy a time for thoughts of that nature. As this project has been very much talked of by the gentleman above-mentioned to men of the greatest genius, as well as quality; I am informed there is now a design on foot for executing the proposal which was then made, and that we shall have several farthings and halfpence charged on the reverse with many of the glorious particulars of her Majesty's reign. This is one of those arts of peace which may very well deserve to be cultivated, and which may be of great use to posterity. As I have in my possession the copy of the paper above-mentioned, which was delivered to the late lord treasurer, I shall here give the public a sight of it. For I do not question but that the curious part of my readers will be very well pleased to see so much matter, and so many useful hints upon this subject, laid together in so clear and concise a manner. THE English have not been so careful as other polite nations to preserve the memory of their great actions and events on medals. Their subjects are few, their mottos and devices mean, and the coins them 4 Dr. Swift. Something in this way was actually done under the direction of sir Andrew Fountaine, who was warden of the Mint, and raised, but did not gratify the expectations of the public. The coins and medals struck with relation to public affairs fell very far short of those of the ancients, and even of France, in design, device, spirit, and legend; it was said that the warden's genius was cramped by the saving knowledge of some people concerned in the business. Sir A. Fountaine was knighted by king William, and was vice-chamberlain to queen Caroline. He was well versed in the knowledge of antiquities, and perfectly master of the taste of virtu. In the 78th year of his age, he died at his seat at Narford in Norfolk, a. d. 1753. His fine and large collection of antiquities, china, Roman Fayence, called Raphael's Earthen Ware, &c. &c. was disposed at his seat in the most secure and elegant manner, where it still is, or was very lately, selves not numerous enough to spread among the people, or descend to posterity. The French have outdone us in these particulars, and by the establishment of a society for the invention of proper inscriptions and designs, have the whole history of their present king in a regular series of medals. They have failed as well as the English, in coining so small a number of each kind, and those of such costly metals, that each species may be lost in a few ages, and is at present no where to be met with but in the cabinets of the curious. The ancient Romans took the only effectual method to disperse and preserve their medals, by making them their current money. Every thing glorious or useful, as well in peace as war, gave occasion to a different coin. Not only an expedition, victory, or triumph, but the exercise of a solemn devotion, the remission of a duty or tax, a new temple, sea-port, or high-way, were transmitted to posterity after this manner. The greatest variety of devices are on their copper money, which have most of the designs that are to be met with on the gold and silver, and several peculiar to that metal only. By this means they were dispersed into the remotest corners of the empire, came into the possession of the poor as well as rich, and were in no danger of perishing in the hands of those that might have melted down coins of a more valuable metal. Add to all this, that the designs were invented by men of genius, and executed by a decree of senate. It is therefore proposed, I. That the English farthings and halfpence be recoined upon the union of the two nations. II. That they bear devices and inscriptions allud ing to all the most remarkable parts of her Majesty's reign. III. That their be a society established for the finding out of proper subjects, inscriptions, and de vices. IV. That no subject, inscription, or device, be stamped without the approbation of this society, nor, if it be thought proper, without the authority of privycouncil. By this means, medals that are at present only a dead treasure, or mere curiosities, will be of use in the ordinary commerce of life, and at the same time, perpetuate the glories of her Majesty's reign, reward the labours of her greatest subjects, keep alive in the people a gratitude for public services, and excite the emulation of posterity. To these generous purposes nothing can so much contribute as medals of this kind, which are of undoubted authority, of necessary use and observation, not perishable by time, nor confined to any certain place; properties not to be found in books, statues, pictures, buildings, or any other monuments of illustrious actions. SIR, 'I was left a thousand pounds by an uncle; and being a man to my thinking very likely to get a r * ADDISON'S. Distinguished by a hand, the mark of Addison's papers in the Guardian, as Steele informs us in The Publisher to the Reader. It is reprinted in Addison's Works, 4to. edit. 1721, vol. iv. p. 138. |