Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936-1961Oxford University Press, 1994 M02 24 - 416 páginas From the 1930s to the early 1960s civil rights law was made primarily through constitutional litigation. Before Rosa Parks could ignite a Montgomery Bus Boycott, the Supreme Court had to strike down the Alabama law which made segregated bus service required by law; before Martin Luther King could march on Selma to register voters, the Supreme Court had to find unconstitutional the Southern Democratic Party's exclusion of African-Americans; and before the March on Washington and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Supreme Court had to strike down the laws allowing for the segregation of public graduate schools, colleges, high schools, and grade schools. Making Civil Rights Law provides a chronological narrative history of the legal struggle, led by Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, that preceded the political battles for civil rights. Drawing on interviews with Thurgood Marshall and other NAACP lawyers, as well as new information about the private deliberations of the Supreme Court, Tushnet tells the dramatic story of how the NAACP Legal Defense Fund led the Court to use the Constitution as an instrument of liberty and justice for all African-Americans. He also offers new insights into how the justices argued among themselves about the historic changes they were to make in American society. Making Civil Rights Law provides an overall picture of the forces involved in civil rights litigation, bringing clarity to the legal reasoning that animated this "Constitutional revolution", and showing how the slow development of doctrine and precedent reflected the overall legal strategy of Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP. |
Contenido
3 | |
6 | |
20 | |
Routine Work in the 1940s | 42 |
Criminal Law and Race Discrimination | 56 |
5 The Increasing Power of Private Discrimination | 67 |
Attacking Restrictive Covenants | 81 |
Challenging the White Primary | 99 |
Examining History | 196 |
Devising the Remedy | 217 |
Passive Resistance to Brown 19551961 | 232 |
Massive Resistance to Brown 19551961 | 247 |
Violent Resistance to Brown 19551961 | 257 |
The Attack on the Lawyers 19551961 | 272 |
The Attack on the NAACP 19551961 | 283 |
The Changing Context of Civil Rights Litigation | 301 |
Education Cases 19391945 | 116 |
Making the Record on Segregated Universities | 126 |
The Supreme Court Deals with Segregated Universities | 137 |
Making the Record in Brown | 150 |
The Law in Brown | 168 |
Inside the Supreme Court | 187 |
Power not Reason | 314 |
Notes | 317 |
Bibliography | 371 |
Table of Cases | 381 |
Index | 385 |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936-1961 Mark V. Tushnet Vista previa limitada - 1994 |
Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936-1961 Mark V. Tushnet Vista previa limitada - 1994 |
Términos y frases comunes
A. P. Tureaud action African-American Alabama April argued asked attack attorney believed branch Brennan brief Brown Carter challenge civil rights Clarendon County Clark Congress constitutional County court of appeals Court's decision defendants desegregation developed discrimination dissent district Douglas Papers draft enforce federal court Fourteenth Amendment Frankfurter's Harlan Houston ibid issue Jackson Jim Crow Judge Kluger law school lawsuit litigation Little Rock Marshall's Maryland massive resistance memorandum Montgomery bus boycott NAACP Papers NAACP's lawyers NAACP's Legal Strategy Negro opinion oral argument plaintiffs Plessy political problem question race racial Reed restrictive covenants Robinson saying school board segregated schools separate but equal Sept South Carolina Southern Spottswood Robinson staff state's statute suggested Super Chief Supreme Court Sweatt Texas Thurgood Marshall tion TM to White told trial Tureaud Tushnet unconstitutional University Vinson Virginia voting wanted Warren white primary Wilkins William wrote
Pasajes populares
Página 214 - To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.
Página 162 - Segregation of white and colored children in public schools has a detrimental effect upon the colored children. The impact is greater when it has the sanction of the law; for the policy of separating the races is usually interpreted as denoting the inferiority of the Negro group. A sense of inferiority affects the motivation of a child to learn.
Página 107 - The United States is a constitutional democracy. Its organic law grants to all citizens a right to participate in the choice of elected officials without restriction by any state because of race.
Página 170 - The most common instance of this is connected with the establishment of separate schools for white and colored children, which has been held to be a valid exercise of the legislative power even by courts of States where the political rights of the colored race have been longest and most earnestly enforced.
Página 95 - It is, therefore, no answer to these petitioners to say that the courts may also be induced to deny white persons rights of ownership and occupancy on grounds of race or color. Equal protection of the laws is not achieved through indiscriminate imposition of inequalities.
Página 104 - Where the state law has made the primary an integral part of the procedure of choice, or where in fact the primary effectively controls the choice, the right of the elector to have his ballot counted at the primary is likewise included in the right protected by Article I, § 2.
Página 51 - Today, as in ages past, we are not without tragic proof that the exalted power of some governments to punish manufactured crime dictatorially is the handmaid of tyranny.
Página 171 - It should be noted, to begin with, that all legal restrictions which curtail the civil rights of a single racial group are immediately suspect. That is not to say that all such restrictions are unconstitutional. It is to say that courts must subject them to the most rigid scrutiny.
Página 3 - It is a peculiar sensation, this double-consciousness, this sense of always looking at one's self through the eyes of others, of measuring one's soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity. One ever feels his twoness — an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body, whose dogged strength alone keeps it from being torn asunder.
Página 114 - But manifestly no justification for it can be found unless as an integral part of such regulation. The exaction cannot be wrested out of its setting, denominated an excise for raising revenue and legalized by ignoring its purpose as a mere instrumentality for bringing about a desired end. To do this would be to shut our eyes to what all others than we can see and understand.
Referencias a este libro
From Savage to Negro: Anthropology and the Construction of Race, 1896-1954 Lee D. Baker Vista previa limitada - 1998 |
Literacy and Racial Justice: The Politics of Learning After Brown V. Board ... Catherine Prendergast Sin vista previa disponible - 2003 |