Hearings, Reports and Prints of the Senate Committee on the JudiciaryU.S. Government Printing Office, 1957 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 20
... legislation through , to have that proposal considered separately on its own merits . Finally , we are opposed to the omnibus bill such as S. 510 , because it seems to us that including so many different kinds of proposals in a single ...
... legislation through , to have that proposal considered separately on its own merits . Finally , we are opposed to the omnibus bill such as S. 510 , because it seems to us that including so many different kinds of proposals in a single ...
Página 37
... legislation which we are proposing unless the Constitution and laws of the United States have been violated . Senator ERVIN . In other words , a suit would never be brought unless the laws had been violated ? Mr. BROWNELL . Federal laws ...
... legislation which we are proposing unless the Constitution and laws of the United States have been violated . Senator ERVIN . In other words , a suit would never be brought unless the laws had been violated ? Mr. BROWNELL . Federal laws ...
Página 88
... legislation unless I can convince my colleagues here in the Congress that this legislation is unwise and unsound , and will not solve the problem that the authors of this resolution are trying to reach . It strikes me , gentlemen , it ...
... legislation unless I can convince my colleagues here in the Congress that this legislation is unwise and unsound , and will not solve the problem that the authors of this resolution are trying to reach . It strikes me , gentlemen , it ...
Página 102
... legislation have been nil . Since 1877 , or 80 years ago , there has been no gain , so far as Federal legislation is concerned , in the field of so - called civil rights . Senator HENNINGS . Do I understand the Senator to say 18 years ...
... legislation have been nil . Since 1877 , or 80 years ago , there has been no gain , so far as Federal legislation is concerned , in the field of so - called civil rights . Senator HENNINGS . Do I understand the Senator to say 18 years ...
Página 114
... legislative branch of both House and Senate . And I may say as individual gentlemen you are very fine . Senator ERVIN ... legislation is in terms of scope and degree . Senator DOUGLAS . This may be masculine prejudice , Mr. 114 CIVIL ...
... legislative branch of both House and Senate . And I may say as individual gentlemen you are very fine . Senator ERVIN ... legislation is in terms of scope and degree . Senator DOUGLAS . This may be masculine prejudice , Mr. 114 CIVIL ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
14th amendment action affidavits apply Assistant Attorney authority believe BLOCH BROWNELL Causey Chairman citizens civil rights civil-rights bills Commission committee Congress constitutional rights contempt County criminal decision denied Department of Justice deprived discrimination district enacted enforcement fact FAISON Federal courts Federal Government FEPC Gus Courts hearings Humphreys County individual injunction investigation judge jurisdiction legislation lynching matter McLEAN ment Mississippi NAACP national origin Negro North Carolina Ouachita Parish party person poll tax precinct present President privileges proposed prosecution protection provisions punishment question race registrar remedies right to vote segregation Senator ERVIN Senator HENNINGS Senator HRUSKA Senator JOHNSTON Senator TALMADGE Senator WATKINS SLAYMAN so-called civil rights South statement statute subcommittee Supreme Court testimony thing tion title 18 trial by jury United States Code UNITED STATES SENATE violation voters White Citizens Council witnesses
Pasajes populares
Página 107 - There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Página 337 - Not only, therefore, can there be no loss of separate and independent autonomy to the States, through their union under the Constitution, but it may be not unreasonably said that the preservation of the States, and the maintenance of their governments, are as much within the design and care of the Constitution as the preservation of the Union and the maintenance of the National government. The Constitution, in all its provisions, looks to an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States.
Página 283 - It requires no argument to show that the right to work for a living in the common occupations of the community is of the very essence of the personal freedom and opportunity that it was the purpose of the Amendment to secure.
Página 138 - If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States...
Página 113 - ... (2) study and collect information concerning legal developments constituting a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution...
Página 135 - States for the District of Columbia, within the jurisdiction of which the inquiry is carried on or within the jurisdiction of which said person guilty of contumacy or refusal to obey is found or resides or transacts business...
Página 161 - General), (2) setting forth facts pertaining to such pattern or practice, and (3) requesting such relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or other order...
Página 150 - ... any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he is compelled, after having claimed his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or produce evidence, except that such individual so testifying shall not be exempt from prosecution and punishment for perjury committed in so testifying.
Página 111 - that all men are created equal, and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights — among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,' I shall strenuously contend for the immediate enfranchisement of our slave population.
Página 108 - But in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.