Hearings, Reports and Prints of the Senate Committee on the JudiciaryU.S. Government Printing Office, 1957 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 100
Página 5
... answer a list of 20 questions . The questions required them to name all candidates running for office . in the county , to define primary and general elections , to state whether they were members of the NAACP , and whether they would ...
... answer a list of 20 questions . The questions required them to name all candidates running for office . in the county , to define primary and general elections , to state whether they were members of the NAACP , and whether they would ...
Página 21
... answer any questions you may have . Senator HENNINGS . We appreciate very much your coming here today and calling attention as you have in this prepared statement to these matters . I guess you and I could talk about this for a month in ...
... answer any questions you may have . Senator HENNINGS . We appreciate very much your coming here today and calling attention as you have in this prepared statement to these matters . I guess you and I could talk about this for a month in ...
Página 34
... answer is based upon two asumptions , first , that State officials never make any mistakes , and the Federal courts always abide by the rulings of the State officials when they are right , and the second is that Federal courts never ...
... answer is based upon two asumptions , first , that State officials never make any mistakes , and the Federal courts always abide by the rulings of the State officials when they are right , and the second is that Federal courts never ...
Página 37
... answer to this ques- tion : That the suits which these amendments incorporate in parts 3 and 4 of S. 83 , in virtually all cases , will be brought by the Attorney General of the United States against a State official acting within the ...
... answer to this ques- tion : That the suits which these amendments incorporate in parts 3 and 4 of S. 83 , in virtually all cases , will be brought by the Attorney General of the United States against a State official acting within the ...
Página 38
... answer to that would be this , Senator : My experience , at least , in election - law cases in the State level is that that is a matter for discretion of the judge , and that if necessary he brings the parties before him and has a full ...
... answer to that would be this , Senator : My experience , at least , in election - law cases in the State level is that that is a matter for discretion of the judge , and that if necessary he brings the parties before him and has a full ...
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
14th amendment action affidavits apply Assistant Attorney authority believe BLOCH BROWNELL Causey Chairman citizens civil rights civil-rights bills Commission committee Congress constitutional rights contempt County criminal decision denied Department of Justice deprived discrimination district enacted enforcement fact FAISON Federal courts Federal Government FEPC Gus Courts hearings Humphreys County individual injunction investigation judge jurisdiction legislation lynching matter McLEAN ment Mississippi NAACP national origin Negro North Carolina Ouachita Parish party person poll tax precinct present President privileges proposed prosecution protection provisions punishment question race registrar remedies right to vote segregation Senator ERVIN Senator HENNINGS Senator HRUSKA Senator JOHNSTON Senator TALMADGE Senator WATKINS SLAYMAN so-called civil rights South statement statute subcommittee Supreme Court testimony thing tion title 18 trial by jury United States Code UNITED STATES SENATE violation voters White Citizens Council witnesses
Pasajes populares
Página 107 - There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.
Página 337 - Not only, therefore, can there be no loss of separate and independent autonomy to the States, through their union under the Constitution, but it may be not unreasonably said that the preservation of the States, and the maintenance of their governments, are as much within the design and care of the Constitution as the preservation of the Union and the maintenance of the National government. The Constitution, in all its provisions, looks to an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States.
Página 283 - It requires no argument to show that the right to work for a living in the common occupations of the community is of the very essence of the personal freedom and opportunity that it was the purpose of the Amendment to secure.
Página 138 - If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States...
Página 113 - ... (2) study and collect information concerning legal developments constituting a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution...
Página 135 - States for the District of Columbia, within the jurisdiction of which the inquiry is carried on or within the jurisdiction of which said person guilty of contumacy or refusal to obey is found or resides or transacts business...
Página 161 - General), (2) setting forth facts pertaining to such pattern or practice, and (3) requesting such relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or other order...
Página 150 - ... any penalty or forfeiture for or on account of any transaction, matter, or thing concerning which he is compelled, after having claimed his privilege against self-incrimination, to testify or produce evidence, except that such individual so testifying shall not be exempt from prosecution and punishment for perjury committed in so testifying.
Página 111 - that all men are created equal, and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights — among which are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,' I shall strenuously contend for the immediate enfranchisement of our slave population.
Página 108 - But in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.