Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][graphic][merged small]

and is either shale, sandstone, limestone, conglomerate, a mixture of two or more of them, or an alternation of two or more in strata of varying order and thickness. If we go deep enough down through sand, gravel and clay (it may be 500 feet in some parts of Indiana) we shall always strike bed-rock of some kind, and since sand, gravel and clay always occur on top of bed-rock and never under it, they are collectively called mantle rock.

On the west side of the Wabash river near Terre Haute a cut across the end of a bluff has been

shale quarries, and it should not be used as a substitute for actual study in the field. Fig. 12 is from a photograph of the face of the quarry and shows a section of the hill from the top as far down as excavation has been made, forty-one feet. The picture shows it as it looks from a single standpoint plus some distortion due to the lens of the camera. Fig. 13 is a diagramatic section which shows the thickness and position of the strata as they really are. The limits of the strata shown in Fig. 13 are marked on the picture by heavy black lines. At

[blocks in formation]

tains. Iron is the almost universal coloring matter of rocks as well of green vegetation and red blood. When exposed to air or percolating water containing air it usually oxidizes or rusts to the familiar red color. This upper six feet of bedrock, by the action of such water, is weathering into mantle rock, and if it were not for the stratum of sand which separates them, it would be hard to tell where mantle rock ends and bed-rock begins. Thus, even down in the crust of the earth, bedrock is being changed into mantle rock. Under the feet of the man in the picture is about two feet of light gray, pasty shale, which naturally breaks up into irregular pieces which look like lumps of tallow dug out and smoothed over with a ladle. Below this is thirteen feet of a darker gray shale in regular, even, horizontal layers two to four inches thick. This is the most nearly typical shale in the quarry. Below this is a two-foot band of very fine-grained, compact limestone. It is not continuous, but broken up into blocks two or three feet in diameter with more or less rounded corners and edges. The surface of these blocks is dark red, and the red color extends into the block from half an inch to an inch or more. The outer red portion is softer and partially decomposed. Inside the red shell the limestone is of a rich pinkish drab color. Here, again, is an example of the action of underground water carrying air down into the cracks or joints of a very compact rock and slowly rotting it. The limestone blocks are not used by the brick-makers, and are thrown aside, forming a pile in the foreground of the picture. The next seven feet is one single stratum of shale without any horizontal seams or partings, but broken by numerous irregular cracks which, at the point where the quarry tools lean against it, radiate from the bottom in gracefully curved lines like a sheaf of wheat tied at the butt. In the sunlight this shale shows innumerable glittering specks which, under a magnifier, prove to be minute cubic crystals of pyrite or "fool's gold." These crystals are very hard and rapidly wear away the augers and drills used in quarrying. Last is about one foot of shale, soft enough to be cut with a knife. The floor of the quarry is limestone again.

The exact arrangement of material described above could hardly be found anywhere else in the world; but certain features are of general occur

rence.

(1) The growth and decay of vegetation produces chemical changes in the top soil, which are indicated by its color; sometimes darker, and sometimes lighter, than the material immediately below.

(2) The mantle rock is usually a very thin layer

[ocr errors]

compared with the known crust of the earth; no thicker than the cuticle compared with the whole skin.

(3) The mantle rock is growing thicker by additions at the bottom. This is due to the weathering or decomposition of bed-rock by percolating water and air.

(4) Some mantle rock is carried away by water, ice or wind and deposited again at a distance; some remains undisturbed where it is formed. The glacial clay and sand was brought by the icesheet from the North, a portion of it from Canada. The clay formed by the weathering of the shale lies undisturbed and is called residual clay.

(5) Shale is a bed-rock formed when clay is subjected to great pressure. It is compacted mud and is a very common rock always accurring in strata which, outside of mountainous regions, are nearly horizontal. The "soapstone" and "slate," socalled by the miners, are varieties of shale. There is no real soapstone or slate in Indiana except fragments found in the glacial drift.

(6) The character of shale may vary considerably within a few feet of depth, owing to varying conditions when the original clay of which it is made was laid down.

(7) Different kinds of bed-rock, as shale and limestone, occur in beds of varying thickness and order.

(8) Bed-rock is not continuous for any great distance vertically or horizontally, but is broken by seams and cracks in both directions, by means of which surface water is able everywhere to penetrate the crust of the earth to an indefinite depth.

A half day spent by a class in sketching the general features of such an exposure, drawing sections and examining the materials on the spot, followed by full and free discussion in the classroom and a more minute examination of specimens brought away, then finally by a second visit to settle disputed points, is a piece of truly scientific work, and may be expected to expand knowledge and to develop power as only scientific work

can.

I urge upon you that the school of to-day must to-morrow be the school of yesterday. There must be constant improve

ment.

It is the education of our youth in every department of our present military science that has strewn the shores with twenty-one of the finest European warships. We must have not only the best navy in the world, but the best university in the world, the best artists, the best musicians, the best men in every line of mental activity. To possess Hawaii, to possess the Philippines is but little. But it is the whole world which we must conquer with ideas that are American, and it is the American school that must accomplish this.A. E. WINSHIP, at the Washington meeting.

MATHEMATICS.

EDITED BY

ROBERT J. ALEY, Ph. D., Bloomington, Ind.

HISTORY OF ARITHMETIC.

I. ORIGIN OF NUMBER.

Leslie, in his Philosophy of Arithmetic says: "The idea of number, though not the most easily acquired, remounts to the earliest epochs of society, and must be nearly coeval with the formation of language. The very savage, who draws from the practice of fishing or hunting a precarious support for himself and family, is eager, on his return home, to count over the produce of his toilsome exertions. But the leader of a troop is obliged to carry further his skill in numeration. He prepares to attack a rival tribe, by marshalling his followers; and, after the bloody conflict is over, he reckons up the slain, and marks his unhappy and devoted captives." Leslie goes on to show that when the numbers were small the savage could easily represent them by portable objects, such as small pebbles or shells. In that stage, the correspondence of one to one, was all the number idea needed. A single pebble would correspond to each warrior of the party or to each victim of the chase. As the savage developed and extended his operations, this method became cumbersome and there arose a need for a better method of representation. Out of this need came grouping and naming.

Dr. Brooks, in his Philosophy of Arithmetic, says: "Number was primarily a thought in the mind of Deity. He put forth his creative hand, and number became a fact of the Universe. It was projected everywhere in all things, and through all things. The flower numbered its petals, the crystal counted its faces, the insect its eyes, the evening its stars, and the moon-Time's golden horologe, marked the months and the seasons. Man was created to apprehend the numerical idea. Finding it embodied in the material world, he exclaimed, with the enthusiasm of Pythagoras, -Number is the essence of the universe, the architype of creation.'”

If we accept the ideas of Leslie and Dr. Brooks, then, we must find the origin of number in the contemplation of the material world. The inquiry, how many, that arises in the presence of the multitudinous combinations of the material world gives rise to the idea of number. In this way the number idea of the Deity becomes, through objects, the number idea of the human being.

This idea, at first indefinite, becomes definite through counting. The regular succession of count

ing implies time; in fact, is only possible in time. Hence, the idea of number, in its origin, is due to the fact of time. Time is related to number very much as space is to extension. Space conditions geometry, time conditions arithmetic, the science of number. Thus we see that time and space are responsible for the two great divisions of mathematics. Whewell, in his Inductive Sciences, develops this thought very fully.

The majority of writers upon the origin of number substantially agree with the statements made above. McLellan & Dewey, however, in The Psychology of Number, take a different view. They claim that number is psychical in its nature. In the summary on page thirty-two they say: "The idea of number is not impressed upon the mind by objects even when these are presented under the most favorable circumstances. Number is a product of the way in which the mind deals with objects in the operation of making a vague whole definite." On page forty-two they say: "Number arises in the process of the exact measurement of a given quantity with a view to instituting a balance, the need of this balance, or accurate adjustment of means to end, being some limitation." This view is admirably worked out in The Psychology of Number to which the reader is referred. When thoroughly understood, it is seen to not differ very greatly from the first view.

What is the actual origin of number will probably always be an unsettled question. Such is the opinion of Dr. Conant, who has given the subject years of careful study. No barbarous race has been found without number ideas. Of course the lower in the scale the race is, the more limited are its number ideas. In some the ideas do not extend beyond one and two. Dr. Conant says: "We know of no language in which the suggestion of number does not appear, and we must admit that the words which give expression to the number sense would be among the early words to be formed in any language. They express ideas which are, at first, wholly concrete, which are of the greatest possible simplicity, and which seem in many ways to be clearly understood, even by the higher orders of the brute creation. The origin of number would in itself, then, appear to lie beyond the proper limits of inquiry; and the primitive conception of number to be fundamental with human thought."

Sir:

THE NO-RATIO FAD.

There is a leading article in the March number of THE EDUCATOR entitled the "Ratio-Fad" which appears to be intended as a criticism of McLellan

& Dewey's Psychology of Number and of the Public School Arithmetic based upon that work. I have not time (nor at present health) to spend upon psychological crudities and fertile misconceptions of the plain teachings of the book; but in this case as there is a show of logical apparatus and an ostentatious pretense of fairness, I shall, with your permission, notice a single and essential point to show your readers the worthlessness of such criticism for either instruction or reproof. From a few garbled extracts, the critic asserts that the Psychology of Number "teaches that number is nothing but ratio." The rules of polite writing forbid the application of the only epithet that rightly describes this statement. I will say only that it is marked by a unique economy of truth. For it is absolutely false to both the spirit and the formal teaching of the book. If there is one thing more than another emphasized in the Psychology of Number it is that ratio is not the whole of number; that counting is the fundamental numerical operation; that number is the tool of measurement, a means to an end. The end, namely, of making definite some vaguely known total; that therefore the number process involves three factors:

(1) Some whole to be defined; (2) discriminated parts-units; (3) the how many of these parts making up or equalling the defined whole. Now, there need be no controversy about the meaning of the book.

Upon this the very essence of its doctrine, all who are interested in arithmetic and its teachingeven the youngest teachers in the country, may decide this question for themselves, independent of all critics and of all criticism, whether due to imbecility or ignorance, to perversity or prejudice. They have only to glance at The Psychology of Number itself, and at The Public School Arithmetic, based on The Psychology of Number, and published by the Macmillans last year; or at The Primary Public School Arithmetic, based on The Psychology of Number-introductory to the Public School Arithmetic, and published by the same firm a few days ago. This entire series of books, both in their doctrine and their practice, are a standing proof of "the lack of understanding," or presence of "wilful misrepresentation" on the part of the critic.

As I have said elsewhere: There are two extreme views regarding the nature of number leading to two quite different pedagogical methods; one of these, No Ratio in Number; the other, No Number in Ratio. The one begins with the ratio idea and ignores or subordinates the how many (counting) idea, leaving it to struggle into being incidentally in the development of ratio. The other begins with the vague how many and subordinates ratio,

or rather totally ignores it, as not involved in the number process. The text-books in arithmetic before mentioned, following as they do The Psychology of Number, avoid both extremes. They begin (especially, of course, in the primary) with the "How many" as applied to some total; and keeping together things which psychologically cannot be separated, proceed from the vague how many and the vague how much to the definite so many and the definite so much. There is thus gradually yet surely evolved the concept of ratio-a concept which is indispensable in practical life, and without which there can be no science of arithmetic.

As already said the "how much" and the "how many" are correlative; i. e., number and magnitude have a mutually defining relation; making definite the one depends on making definite the other. Yet there are persons who know so little of Dr. Dewey's power of analysis as to suppose (or assert) that he actually teaches that the numerical definition of a quantity has nothing to do with number-with units and with the how many of them which make up the quantity.

The mental movements of such critics are about as effective against the position of Dewey, the philosopher, as were the movements of the unwieldy Spanish hulks against that other Dewey, the naval hero.

This one sample of the critic's "understanding" and "fairness" must suffice: ex uno disce omnia. J. A. MCLELLAN.

PRESIDENT, ONTARIO NORMAL.

NOTES.

Miss Harriett Powell will teach mathematics in the Rockport High School next year.

The Anderson High School is fortunate in securing the services of Mr. E. C. Welborn as teach. er of mathematics. He is a superior teacher and a well-trained mathematician.

Professor S. C. Davison has been granted a scholarship at Harvard and will go there next year for graduate study.

The American Book Co. is now issuing the Cornell Mathematical Series under the general editorship of Professor Waite. Murray's Integral Calculus has already appeared, and an Analytic Geometry and a Differential Calculus are in press.

The international Lobachérski prize of five hundred roubles for the best work in geometry, preferably non-Euclidean, has just been awarded to Sophus Lie of Leipzig. Lie is one of the two or three greatest mathematicians of the world.

Scott, Foresman & Co. of Chicago have just issued the Rational Elementary Arithmetic by Dr. H. H. Belfield, director of the Chicago Manual Train

ing School. Comparison is the basis of the work. For this purpose colored lines, squares, spheres and rectangles are used. In this way drill in color and number is combined. From comparison the way is led by easy stages to concrete problems of every-day experience. Drill in the abstract combinations of numbers is made a prominent feature. The book is made up entirely of problems and exercises. The matter treated in the problems covers a wide range of interesting and valuable knowledge. The book will certainly interest the pupils and assist them in easily mastering elementary arithmetic.

There has recently been issued from the press of Longmans, Green & Co. a little book on Elementary and Constructional Geometry by E. H. Nichols of the Brown & Nichols School, Cambridge, Massachusetts. It is intended for pupils beginning geometry at the age of ten or twelve, and is to be a guide to the teacher rather than a class text-book. The main purpose of the book is to make the pupil expert in the construction of geometrical figures and to familiarize him with the language and concepts of geometry. The exercises are interesting and well arranged. In our western schools the book will prove useful by furnishing useful and desirable supplementary work for the seventh and eighth grades.

In the preface of the Primary Public School Arithmetic the following very round statement is found: "While number work in the first grade may be largely incidental, it ought not to be accidental. The teacher should have a clear conception of the work to be done, and of the order and method by which the child may step by step reach the desired end. When the child enters school the number sense is alert; he is, roughly speaking, in the counting stage of development. Upon the principle, strike while the iron is hot,' this counting power should at once be used for further growth by applying it to more definite measurements. Such application arouses fresh interest in number and is in a high degree educative."

Wallace Thornton of Jersey City, in the Journal of Education, says: "In none of the fads grafted on to our curriculums is the departure from the rules of right reason more marked than in the teaching of arithmetic. It has become the recognized rule that primary, intermediate and grammar grade classes differ, not in the nature of their several divisions of arithmetic, but simply in the numerical value of multipliers, divisors, denominators or decimals. The child of six is now confronted with the whole field of arithmetic the first term he enters school. He is taught to form correct ideas of number in the integer, the fraction,

« AnteriorContinuar »