Leading Cases and Opinions on International Law: War and neutralitySweet and Maxwell, 1924 |
Contenido
344 | |
355 | |
356 | |
358 | |
359 | |
361 | |
362 | |
364 | |
39 | |
56 | |
62 | |
64 | |
68 | |
71 | |
77 | |
78 | |
82 | |
86 | |
87 | |
91 | |
92 | |
102 | |
103 | |
105 | |
107 | |
109 | |
110 | |
112 | |
118 | |
126 | |
137 | |
144 | |
147 | |
155 | |
175 | |
181 | |
184 | |
188 | |
196 | |
203 | |
204 | |
211 | |
212 | |
213 | |
219 | |
220 | |
231 | |
237 | |
238 | |
243 | |
244 | |
251 | |
257 | |
259 | |
262 | |
267 | |
270 | |
272 | |
278 | |
279 | |
286 | |
295 | |
299 | |
300 | |
307 | |
309 | |
312 | |
314 | |
316 | |
322 | |
328 | |
329 | |
332 | |
365 | |
373 | |
376 | |
379 | |
380 | |
383 | |
389 | |
395 | |
396 | |
408 | |
413 | |
414 | |
420 | |
423 | |
428 | |
430 | |
433 | |
438 | |
441 | |
446 | |
451 | |
466 | |
467 | |
478 | |
485 | |
486 | |
496 | |
500 | |
506 | |
509 | |
513 | |
514 | |
519 | |
527 | |
532 | |
540 | |
544 | |
546 | |
552 | |
555 | |
558 | |
562 | |
564 | |
565 | |
566 | |
573 | |
581 | |
589 | |
591 | |
595 | |
596 | |
602 | |
608 | |
611 | |
616 | |
625 | |
635 | |
637 | |
639 | |
641 | |
645 | |
647 | |
673 | |
680 | |
Términos y frases comunes
alien enemy American appear apply authority belligerent belonging blockade Britain British Government British subjects capture cargo carried claim commercial condemnation Conference confiscation contraband contract crew Crown debts Declaration Declaration of London domicil Droit duty effect enemy character enemy country enemy property entitled exempt fact flag force France French German ground Hague Convention Hall held hospital ships hostilities illegal indemnity infra international law issued judgment jurisdiction land law of nations laws of war liable Lord Stowell maritime martial law ment military municipal law Naval Prize neutral country neutral port neutral territory occupation officers Oppenheim Order in Council outbreak owner parties peace persons plaintiff Powers practice principle prisoners prisoners of war Prize Court Prize Law proceedings prohibited provisions purpose question reason recognised regarded regulations relation resident respect rule Russian Russo-Japanese War seized seizure subsequently Supra tion trade treaty United violation warships Westlake whilst
Pasajes populares
Página 456 - First, to use due diligence to prevent the fitting out, arming, or equipping, within its jurisdiction, of any vessel which it has reasonable ground to believe is intended to cruise or to carry on war against a power with which it is at peace ; and also to use like diligence to prevent the departure from its jurisdiction of any vessel intended to cruise or carry on war as above, such vessel having been specially adapted, in whole or in part, within such jurisdiction, to warlike use.
Página 140 - The right of belligerents to adopt means of injuring the enemy is not unlimited.
Página 391 - The Allied and Associated Governments affirm and Germany accepts the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.
Página 668 - A vessel carrying contraband may be condemned if the contraband, reckoned either by value, weight, volume, or freight, forms more than half the cargo.
Página 143 - In sieges and bombardments all necessary steps must be taken to spare, as far as possible, buildings dedicated to religion, art, science, or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals, and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not being used at the time for military purposes.
Página 404 - Convention respecting the rights and duties of neutral powers and persons in case of war on land.
Página 422 - When a ship has been captured in the territorial waters of a neutral power, this power must employ, if the prize is still within its jurisdiction, the means at its disposal to release the prize, with its officers and crew, and to intern the prize crew.
Página 128 - ... clause in Article 2 of the Hague Convention of 1907. That clause provided: The provisions contained in the regulations (rules of land warfare) referred to in Article I as well as in the present convention do not apply except between contracting powers, and then only if all the belligerents are parties to the convention.
Página 494 - A neutral Power may allow prizes to enter its ports and roadsteads, whether under convoy or not, when they are brought there to be sequestrated pending the decision of a prize court. It may have the prize taken to another of its ports. If the prize is convoyed by a war-ship, the prize crew may go on board the convoying ship. If the prize is not under convoy, the prize crew are left at liberty.
Página 426 - A prize may only be brought into a neutral port on account of unseaworthiness, stress of weather, or want of fuel or provisions. It must leave as soon as the circumstances which justified its entry are at an end. If it does not, the neutral Power must order it to leave at once ; should it fail to obey, the neutral Power must employ the means at its disposal to release it with its officers and crew and to intern the prize crew.