While Zephaniah, Haggai calls, THE BOOKS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. Mattnew, Mark, Luke, and John wrote the life of their Lord; Rome, Corinth, Galatus, Ephesus, hear What Philippians, Colossians, Thessalonians revere : Timotheus, Titus, Philemon, precede The Epistle which Hebrews most gratefully read; James, Peter, and John, with the short letter Jude, The rounds of Divine Revelation conclude. At Oxford and at Cambridge many of these aids to memory have been handed down traditionally. A correspondent of Notes and Queries tells us that the Rev. Charles Simeon, curate of Trinity College, Cambridge, for fiftythree years, used to remember the books of the New Testament by retaining in mind abbreviated words indicating the order of the books, and forcing them into a rude sort of rhythm while repeating them to himself, as thus: "Rom., Cor. 1 and 2, Gal., Eph., Phil., Col., Thess. I and 2, Tim. 1 and 2, Tit., Phil., Heb., Jas., Pet. 1 and 2, John 1, 2, and 3, Jud., Rev." Whereupon another correspondent (April 30, 1881) wrote to say that 'more than fifty years ago" the following mnemonic verses were current at Exeter College, Oxford: Rōm., Cōr., | Cōr., Gălăt., | Eph., Phil., | Cōl., Thēss., | Thēssălŏ., | Tim., Tim., Tit., Phil., Hě., | Jām., Pēt., | Pét., Jõhn, | Jõhn, Jõhn, | Jūde, Rēvē | lātion. Still another correspondent notes that "there were many aids to memory in vogue at the same period, many of them better forgotten." Among the least harmful he gives an amusing one on the genealogy of Abraham, “which it was supposed to be very necessary to have at one's fingers' ends:" Shem, Arphaxad, Salah, Serug, Nahor, Terah, Tooral looral loo (=Abraham). The following absurdly-sounding line is a rapid mnemonic summary of the Ecumenical Councils in their chronological order: Ni-Co-E | Chal-Co-Co | Ni-Co-La | La-La-La | Ly-Ly-Vi | Flo-Tri. Of course the same number of Ecumenical Councils is not accepted by all. But the reader may easily decipher the above line if he will bear in mind that the following were the names of the places where the Councils were held : Nice, Constantinople, Ephesus, the Lateran, Lyons, Vienna, Florence, Trent. A very curious bit of legal lore is a volume of Sir Edward Coke's Reports in rhyme, which was published by J. Worrall "at the Dove in Bellyard, near Lincoln's Inn, London," in the year 1742. The bookseller's preface is as follows: An ancient manuscript of the following verses falling accidentally into my hands, in which no small pains must have been taken; the publication thereof needs little apology, when it is considered these lines may at the same time not only refresh the memory, and instruct, but also afford a pleasing recreation to gentlemen of the law, and others, by shewing them in a narrow compass a copious and learned body of the law, supported with authority of no less than the great Sir Edward Coke, whose name so long as laws endure will probably be esteemed and revered for his great knowledge, penetrating judgment, and fine reasoning therein. To make the work more useful, I have distinguished every path and case with references to the pages in all the edition of said reports. JOHN WORRALL. Bell-yard, 24th of June, 1742. The volume quotes the opinions of all the learned judges England had prior to the date of compilation, and every phase of the law is dealt with. Several thousand verses are given, and nearly all express law that is as good to-day as it was one hundred and fifty years ago. Here are some of the verses from the volume: None convict upon appeal shall be It is no policy, if you indict, To recite statutes, lest you misrecite. On the subject of contempt of court the report says,— For contempt of court only those Who're judges of record can fine impose. If it did, This is one principle of law that does not hold good in America. justices of the peace would be debarred from assessing fines for contempt. Here is a verse giving a decision credited to Cromwell: The law which doth a pain enact For slander of a peer is a general act. Several verses are devoted to defining what will justify an action for slander. Cutler's opinion is summed up thus: Bert says, For scand'lous articles to tie, To good behavior, action will not lie. Action lies whene'er the words are such As they his life on whom they're spoke may touch. Barham, one of the noted jurists of the time, said,— Where words will yield a milder sense, An innuendo shall not make the offence. Davis probably made the rule more clear than any of them when he said,— For slander action will not lie Unless some temp'ral loss incur thereby. Several of the learned judges quoted in the verse of the volume lay down some law for London : Sue not in the Court of Aldermen ; says one, and another holds that Administrators debts must pay On simple contract, London customs say. The famous rule in Shelley's case is thus given: Where ancestors a freehold take, The words (his heirs) a limitation make. Among the decisions relating to ordinances and by-laws is one that speaks some sound sense. It is, By-laws made by inhabitants of ville, For publick, good; for private, ill. Grammar, anatomy, literature, and history are illustrated in these concluding examples: GRAMMAR IN RHYME. Three little words you often see Are articles, a, an, and the. A noun's the name of anything: Adjectives tell the kind of noun; A noun; as, in or through a door. As, oh! how pretty! ah! how wise! The whole are called nine parts of speech, THE BONES OF THE BODY. How many bones in the human chest? How many bones in the palm of the hand? How many bones in the human thigh? One in each, and deep they lie. How many bones in the human knees? One in each, the kneepan, please. How many bones from the leg to the knee? Two in each, we can plainly see. How many bones in the ankle strong? Seven in each, but none are long. How many bones in the ball of the foot? How many bones in the toes half a score? Twenty-eight, and there are no more. And now altogether these many bones fix, And then we have the human mouth, Of upper and under, thirty-two teeth. And now and then have a bone, I should think, FIRST TWENTY-ONE PRESIDENTS. First stands the lofty Washington, Garfield comes next, the people's choice; A brutal wretch with murderous hand And anxious millions, plunged in grief, Implore in vain Almighty aid That Death's stern hand might still be stayed Arthur's term was then begun, Which made the number twenty-one. EARLY ROMAN KINGS. Romulus founded the city: Founded the Roman religion, Tullus Hostilius, warrior, The Latins contended in vain. Tarquin the Elder, succeeding, A census, the same did procure, But a prince soon after committed Sovereigns OF ENGLAND. First William the Norman, Edwards one, two, and three, Two Edwards, third Richard, Two Henrys, sixth Edward, Another Charles too. Next James the second Then good William and Mary Till, Anne, Georges four, And fourth William all past, May she long be the last! Memory. Though lost to sight, to memory dear. No question is more frequently asked-and answered-than the origin of this quotation. But although the answers are frequent enough, they are always wrong whenever they attempt to clear up the mystery. Probably every one who keeps a scrap-book has treasured away the information, which went the round of the newspapers in 1870, and still goes marching on, that this was the refrain of a poem by Ruthven Jenkins, which appeared in the Greenwich Review for Marines in 1701 or 1702. No such monthly was ever published, in Greenwich or elsewhere; and, indeed, the word "Marines" should have warned the most unwary of a possible hoax. The truth is, the very weak song was deliberately composed (it is said, in Cleveland, Ohio) to lead up to the famous line. It consists of two stanzas, of which the following is the first : Sweetheart, good-by! that fluttering sail Is spread to waft me far from thee, Though lost to sight, to memory dear. As late as 1880 this song was republished, in good faith, in London, but the hoax had been exposed seven years before in Notes and Queries. Bartlett's Familiar Quotations" ascribes the line to George Linley (1798–1865), the author of a song beginning, Though lost to sight, to memory dear Thou ever wilt remain; One only hope my heart can cheer,- The song was composed for and sung by Augustus Braham, probably about 1840. It was set to music and published in London in 1848. But the quotation was a proverb in common use at least as early as 1826, for in the Monthly Magazine for January, 1827 ("Letter on Affairs in General from a Gentleman in Town to a Gentleman in the Country"), it is given as a familiar axiom, and F. C. H., writing to Notes and Queries in 1871, says, "I can safely aver that it is much older than 1828, as I knew it many years before that date." นพ |