| 1953 - 348 páginas
...provided substantially equal facilities, even though these facilities be separate. In the Delaware case, the Supreme Court of Delaware adhered to that doctrine,...Because of the obvious importance of the question presented, the Court took jurisdiction. Argument was heard in the 1952 Term, and reargument was heard... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1956 - 288 páginas
...provided substantially equal facilities, even though these facilities be separate. In the Delaware case, the Supreme Court of Delaware adhered to that doctrine,...Because of the obvious importance of the question presented, the Court took jurisdiction.2. Argument was heard in the 1952 Term, and reargument was heard... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1956 - 286 páginas
...provided substantially equal facilities, even though these facilities be separate. In the Delaware case, the Supreme Court of Delaware adhered to that doctrine,...Because of the obvious importance of the question presented, the Court took jurisdiction.2. Argument was heard in the 1952 Term, and reargument was heard... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1959 - 1668 páginas
...provided substantially equal facilities, even though these facilities be separate. In the Delaware case, the Supreme Court of Delaware adhered to that doctrine,...Because of the obvious importance of the question presented, the Court took jurisdiction.* Argument was heard in the 1952 Term, and reargument was heard... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1959 - 710 páginas
...protection of the laws under the 14th amendment. Through their legal representatives the parents argued that, segregated public schools are not equal and cannot be made equal, and that hence their children were deprived of equal protection of the laws. At the conclusion of the original arguments,... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1963 - 494 páginas
...provided substantially equal facilities, even though these facilities be separate. In the Delaware case, the Supreme Court of Delaware adhered to that doctrine,...Because of the obvious importance of the question presented, the Court took jurisdiction.* Argument was heard in the 1952 Term, and reargument was heard... | |
| |