Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 páginas |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 90
Página 19
... outcome . Thus , choices within an organization are produced by preferences . If something happened , someone wanted it to happen . Different intentions will produce different outcomes . Better intentions will produce better outcomes ...
... outcome . Thus , choices within an organization are produced by preferences . If something happened , someone wanted it to happen . Different intentions will produce different outcomes . Better intentions will produce better outcomes ...
Página 20
... outcome and alternative possible , but not realized , outcomes are seen as fundamental . In our judgment , this idea is a mistake . Substantial differences in final outcomes are sometimes produced by small ( and essentially ...
... outcome and alternative possible , but not realized , outcomes are seen as fundamental . In our judgment , this idea is a mistake . Substantial differences in final outcomes are sometimes produced by small ( and essentially ...
Página 47
... outcomes highly contextual . Since every entrance is an exit somewhere else , the distribution of " entrances " depends on the attri- butes of the choice being left as much as it does on the attributes of the new choice . Substantial ...
... outcomes highly contextual . Since every entrance is an exit somewhere else , the distribution of " entrances " depends on the attri- butes of the choice being left as much as it does on the attributes of the new choice . Substantial ...
Contenido
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest X3 | 38 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 17 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunity choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote