Ambiguity and Choice in OrganizationsUniversitetsforlaget, 1976 - 408 páginas |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 42
Página 27
... that may or may not be accepted . In our terms , invitations may be extended either to individuals as decision - makers or to problems and solutions as decision choice opportunity → ? issues . In the former case 27 Organizational ...
... that may or may not be accepted . In our terms , invitations may be extended either to individuals as decision - makers or to problems and solutions as decision choice opportunity → ? issues . In the former case 27 Organizational ...
Página 28
James G. March, Johan P. Olsen. choice opportunity → ? issues . In the former case we talk about the decision ... opportunity . Thus , the structure is represented by the following array ( in which d¡¡ 1 if the ith individual can ...
James G. March, Johan P. Olsen. choice opportunity → ? issues . In the former case we talk about the decision ... opportunity . Thus , the structure is represented by the following array ( in which d¡¡ 1 if the ith individual can ...
Página 376
... choice opportunities . This process stems from the more or less rational concerns of participants , but the changing meanings that different groups of actors attach to the choice ... opportunity . At the heart of this review is the fact that ...
... choice opportunities . This process stems from the more or less rational concerns of participants , but the changing meanings that different groups of actors attach to the choice ... opportunity . At the heart of this review is the fact that ...
Contenido
Acknowledgments | 7 |
People Problems Solutions and the Ambiguity | 24 |
Attention and the Ambiguity of Selfinterest X3 | 38 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 17 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
3rd grade teacher academic accepted action active administrative allocation alternative ambiguity architecture arena assembly attention attitudes August 27 behavior beliefs candidates chairman choice opportunity choice situations College concerns conflict consider criteria deadline dean decision process decision-making demands desegregation discussion District educational effects energy expect faculty members formal participation full professors garbage garbage can model goals hierarchical house meeting ideology implementation important individual interpretation involved issues junior faculty leaders leadership less major ment non-leaders non-tenured faculty norms Norway Norwegian November 25 observed October 29 Olsen Oppland organization organizational choices outcomes parents perceived percent political position possible problems and solutions procedures professional proposal question rational relatively relevant reorganization response result school committee search committee self-ratings social structure teacher group Telemark tenured theory tion Tromsø Trondheim University of Bergen University of Oslo variables Vice-Chancellor vote