...work." In a sense, all work is new, but from the fact that it is new, it does not follow that it is not a part of the interstate commerce in which the carrier is engaged. As was said by the learned Chief Justice in Li neks v. Erie Railroad Co.. 91 XJL 16f>, following the...

...relation to others or to the business as a whole. But this is an erroneous assumption. The true test is : Is the work in question a part of the interstate commerce in which the carrier is engaged? Of course, we are not here concerned with the construction of tracks, bridges, engines or cars which...

...229 US 146, 152, 33 S. Ct. 648, 650, 57 L. Ed. 1125, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 153, this test is laid down, "Is the work in question a part of the interstate commerce in which the carrier is engaged?" The decisions of the courts on the subject are somewhat inconsistent and give evidence of diversified...

...regardless of its relation to others or to the business as a whole. But this is an erroneous assumption. The true test always is: Is the work in question a part of th.' interstate commerce in which the carrier is engaged? See McCall v. California, 136 US 104, 109,...

...regardless of it relation to others or to the business as a whole. But this is an erroneous a: sumption. The true test always is: Is the work in question a part of th interstate commerce in which the carrier is engaged? See McCall v. Cal fornia, 136 US 104, 109,...

...the nature of each determined regardless of its relation to others, or to the business as a whole," and that "the true test always is: Is the work In...interstate commerce in which the carrier Is engaged?" Viewed from that standpoint, we think It clear that one employed In installing and equipping the road...

...language used in Pedersen v. Del., L. & WRR, 229 US 146, 152, 33 Sup. Ct 648, 650 (57 L. Ed. 1125) that: "The true test always is: Is the work in question...interstate commerce in which the carrier is engaged?" Again it is said at the close of the opinion in the Behrens Case: "The true test is the nature of the...

...regardless of its relation to others or to the business as a whole. But this is an erroneous assumption. The true test always is: Is the work in question a...interstate commerce in which the carrier is engaged? See McCall v. California, 136 US 104, 109, 111; Second Employers' Liability Cases, supra, 6, 59; Zikos...

...However much Is made of the definition In the Pedersen Case and repeated in several succeeding cases: "The true test always is: Is the work in question a part of interstate commerce in which the carrier Is engaged" — which to the writer is no definition at all....

...648, 57 L. Ed. 112Ö, «pon the subject of the test to be applied in detiTQiiuing wuelber the work ia a part of the interstate commerce in which the carrier is engaged." What rule of Interpretation can be deduced from these decisions? None other than that first declared...