Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

or the person to whom they are liable may have his remedy by § 93-95 bill in chancery.

P. L. 1846, pp. 70-71; P. L. 1849, p. 307; Act of 1875, $$ 93-94.

Sections 92 and 94 relate to cases where officers, directors or stockholders are made specifically liable by the provisions of the act for the payment of the debts of the company, and provide in such cases for actions by the creditor. (See Section 52, p. 75, ante.) They do not relate to actions against stockholders to enforce payment of subscriptions for stock. Such proceedings must be by general creditors' bill for the benefit of all. (Wetherbee v. Baker, 35 N. J. Eq., 501, 505.)

Waters v. Quimby is an action under these sections. (27 N. J. Law, 296; 28 Id., 533.)

[ocr errors]

93. Stockholders, etc., who pay company's debts may recover. Any officer, director or stockholder who shall pay any debt of a corporation for which he is made liable by the provisions of this act, may recover the amount so paid, in an action against the corporation for money paid for its use, in which action only the property of the corporation shall be liable to be taken, and not the property of any stockholder.

P. L. 1846, p. 71; P. L. 1849, p. 307; Act of 1875, § 95.

94. Property of director, etc., not to be sold for company's debt until remedy against the company has been exhausted.— No sale or other satisfaction shall be had of the property of any director or stockholder for any debt of the corporation of which he is such director or stockholder till judgment be obtained therefor against such corporation and execution thereon returned unsatisfied, but any suit brought against any director or stockholder for such debts shall stay after execution levied, or other proceedings to acquire a lien, until such return shall have been made.

P. L. 1846, p. 71; Act of 1875, § 96.

X.-Foreign Corporations.

95. Foreign corporation may hold and convey lands, etc.— Any corporation created by any other state or by any foreign state, kingdom or government may acquire by devise or otherwise and hold, mortgage, lease and convey real estate in this state for the purpose of prosecuting its business or objects or such real estate as it may acquire by way of mortgage or otherwise, in the payment of debts due such corporation; provided,

§ 96-97 such foreign state, kingdom or government, under whose laws such corporation was created, shall not be at the time of such purchase at war with the United States.

P. L. 1873, p. 76; Act of 1875, § 99; P. L. 1882, p. 137; P. L. 1883, p. 220; P. L. 1887, p. 157.

96. Foreign corporations subject to this act.-Foreign corporations doing business in this state shall be subject to the provisions of this act, so far as the same can be applied to foreign corporations.

P. L. 1873, p. 76; Act of 1875, § 103.

The question whether an aggregation of individuals is a corporation, or not, is to be determined rather by the faculties and powers conferred upon the body than by the name or description given to it. Thus a joint stock association formed under the New York statute was held to be a corporation in New Jersey, and, as such, empowered to sue and be sued, not, as is usual, however, in a corporate name, but in the name of designated officers, as prescribed by the law of its creation. (Edgeworth v. Wood, 58 N. J. Law, 463.)

As to what constitutes doing business, see notes to § 98.

97. Foreign corporations to file copy of charter, statement, etc., before commencing business.-Every foreign corporation, except banking, insurance; ferry and railroad corporations, before transacting any business in this state, shall file in the office of the secretary of state a copy of its charter or certificate of incorporation, attested by its president and secretary, under its corporate seal, and a statement attested in like manner of the amount of its capital stock authorized and the amount actually issued, the character of the business which it is to transact in this state, and designating its principal office in this state and an agent who shall be a domestic corporation or a natural person of full age actually resident in this state, together with his place of abode, upon which agent process against such corporation may be served, and the agency so constituted shall continue until the substitution, by writing, of another agent; upon the filing of such copy and statement the secretary of state shall issue to such corporation a certificate that it is authorized to transact business in this state, and that the business is such as may be lawfully transacted by corporations of this state, and he shall keep a record of all such certificates issued.

P. L. 1894, p. 346; P. L. 1895, p. 293.

The validity of laws imposing the terms on which foreign corpora- § 98 tions are permitted to do business in a State has been upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in several important cases.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

The first

case was Paul v. Virginia, 8 Wall., 168. It was held that a corporation
is not a citizen within the meaning of that provision of the Constitution
which declares that the citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the
privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States. And Mr.
Justice Field in delivering the opinion of the court said: "The corpora-
"tion being the mere creation of local law can have no legal existence
beyond the limits of the sovereignty where created. As said by this
"court in Bank of Augusta v. Earle, It must dwell in the place of its
"'creation and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. The recognition
"of its existence either by other States, and the enforcement of its con-
"tracts made therein, depend purely upon the comity of those States-
'a comity which is never extended where the existence of the corpora-
tion or the exercise of its powers are prejudicial to their interests or
' repugnant to their policy. Having no absolute right of recognition
"in other States, but depending for such recognition and the enforce-
"ment of its contracts upon their assent, it follows, as a matter of
66 6 course,
that such assent may be granted upon such terms and condi-
tions as those States may think proper to impose.'

666

[ocr errors]

44 6

[ocr errors]

44

This doctrine was reaffirmed in the case of Horn Silver Mining Co. v. New York, 143 U. S., 305, in which Mr. Justice Field, after quoting from the opinion of the former case, adds: "This doctrine has been so frequently declared by this court that it must be deemed no longer a "matter of discussion, if any question can ever be considered at rest." He further declared: Having the absolute power of excluding the 'foreign corporation the State may, of course, impose such conditions upon permitting the corporation to do business within its limits as it may judge expedient; and it may make the grant or privilege depend"ent upon the payment of a specific license tax, or a sum proportioned to "the amount of its capital." (See also Liverpool Ins. Co. v. Oliver, 10 Wall., 56; Ducat v. Chicago, 10 Wall., 410; Pembina, &c., Mining Co. v. Pennsylvania, 125 U. S., 181; Norfolk, &c., R. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 136 U. S., 114; Hooper v. California, 155 U. S., 648; Parke, Davis & Co. v. Roberts, 171 U. S., 658; Blake v. McClung, 172 U. S., 239; Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 172 U. S., 557.)

For a full discussion of the status of foreign corporations, see 6 Thompson on Corporations, Section 7875 et seq.

98. Cannot maintain action until certificate of secretary of state is obtained.—Until such corporation so transacting business in this state shall have obtained said certificate of the secretary of state, it shall not maintain any action in this state, upon any contract made by it in this state; provided, that nothing herein shall prevent the enforcement of any contract made prior to the fourteenth day of March, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-five.

P. L. 1894, p. 346; P. L. 1895, p. 293.

In Faxon Co. v. Lovett, 60 N. J. Law, 128, it was held that this section did not apply when the contract was made without the State.

A corporation which makes a single sale of its product from its office outside of New Jersey to a person in New Jersey, and takes a guarantee

[ocr errors]

99 of payment in New Jersey, does not transact business in the State within the meaning of the statute. (Delaware & H. Canal Co. v. Mahlenbrock, 63 N. J. Law, 281.)

A mortgage is an executed contract, and proceeding to foreclose it is not an action upon a contract such as is contemplated by the statute forbidding unqualified foreign corporations from bringing actions on contracts made within the State. The taking of a mortgage to secure a debt, by a foreign corporation not in the business of loaning money, is a mere incident of its business, and is not such an exercise of its corporate functions within the State as is forbidden by the statute. (American Net & Twine Co. v. Ginthens et al., 21 N. J. L. J., 190.)

66

Our statutes allow a foreign corporation to hold mortgages on lands "in this State, and complainant is entitled to recover the amount due, even though it has not filed the certificate required by Section 97 of the Corporation Act." (Manhattan, &c., Loan Ass'n v. Massareli, 42 Atl. Rev., 284, 285.)

[ocr errors]

Presumption as to complying with law.-In certiorari proceedings where the prosecutors in their reasons filed did not question the status of a foreign corporation, the court will assume on final hearing that the corporation has complied with the prerequisites to doing business in New Jersey. (Benton v. City of Elizabeth, 61 N. J. Law, 411; aff'd 61 N. J. Law, 693.)

99. On death of agent, another to be appointed; penalty for failure. If said agent shall die, remove from the state or become disqualified, such corporation shall forthwith file in the office of the secretary of state a written appointment of another agent, attested in the manner above provided, and in case of the omission to do so within thirty days after such death, removal or disqualification, then the secretary of state, upon being satisfied that such omission has continued for thirty days, shall, by entry on the record thereof, revoke the certificate of authority to transact business within this state, and process against such corporation in actions upon any liability incurred within this state before the designation of another agent may, after such revocation, be served upon the secretary of state; at the time of such service the plaintiff shall pay to the secretary of state for the use of the state two dollars, to be included in the taxable costs of such plaintiff, and the secretary of state shall forthwith mail a copy of such process to such corporation at its general office or to the address of some officer thereof, if known to him.

For provisions as to annual report to be filed by foreign corporation, penalty for such failure, and service of process in case of failure, see § 43, ante.

« AnteriorContinuar »