Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

Ex parte STERNES. (No. 20,481.)

W. L. Dudley, E. S. Pillsbury, (Gordon Blanding, of counsel,) for appellant. J. C. Campbell, S. D. Woods, Joseph H. Budd, E. W. McKinstry, (Edward I. Jones, of coun

Ex parte LEE. (No. 20,482.) (Supreme Court of California. July 25, 1889.) In bank. Application for habeas corpus.sel,) for respondent. BEATTY, C. J. These cases are like Ex parte Sternes, (No. 20,480,) ante, 1132, and upon the authority of that case the petition

ers are remanded.

WORKS, J. This cause is the same in all material respects as that of West v. Crawford, ante. 1123, (this day decided,) and has been submitted on the same briefs, and on We concur: WORKS, J.; SHARPSTEIN, J.; the authority of that case the judgment and PATERSON, J.; Fox, J. order appealed from are affirmed.

WEST . HITCHCOCK. (No. 12,959.)
(Supreme Court of California. July 20, 1889.)
In bank. Appeal from superior court,
San Joaquin county; F. T. BALDWIN, Judge.
W. L. Dudley, E. S. Pillsbury, (Gordon
Blanding, of counsel,) for appellant. J.
C. Campbell, S. D. Woods, Joseph H. Budd,
E. W. McKinstry, (Edward I. Jones, of
counsel,) for respondent.

WORKS, J. This cause is the same in all material respects as that of West v. Crawford, ante, 1123, (this day decided,) and has been submitted on the same briefs, and on the authority of that case the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

We concur: BEATTY, C. J.; SHARPSTEIN, J.; THORNTON, J.; MCFARLAND, J.

WEST . BELDINC. (No. 12,960.)
(Supreme Court of California. July 20, 1889.)
In bank. Appeal from superior court, San
Joaquin countv· F. T. BALDWIN, Judge.

We concur: BEATTY, C. J.; MCFARLAND J.; SHARPSTEIN, J.; THORNTON, J.

STRAIT v. STEWART, Treasurer of Wyandotte County, et al.

(Supreme Court of Kansas. July 5, 1889.) Error to district court, Wyandotte county; O. L. MILLER, Judge.

D. B. Hadley, for plaintiff in error. H. L. Alden, W. S. Carroll, and Hutchings & Keplinger, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM. This was an action brought by the plaintiff in the district court of Wyandotte county, to enjoin the collection of a special assessment levied to pay for the grading of a street. The district court denied the plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction, and to review this order plaintiff brings his petition in error. This case being identical with that of Wahlgreen v. City of Kans.. City, ante, 1068, for the reasons given in that opinion the judgment of the court below must be aflirmed.

END OF VOLUME 21.

« AnteriorContinuar »