« AnteriorContinuar »
ment as of the preceding term, if it was prior to the party's death. Such a power is not, in the sense of the law, a power coupled with an interest.”
a Oades v. Woodward, 1 Salk. 87. Fuller v. Jocelyn, 2 Str. AR2Hunt v. Ennis, 2 Mason, 244. The law of principal and agent has been extensively considered, and the judicial decisions at Westminster Hall digested in several English works; but the Treatise of Mr. Livermore on the Law of Principal and Agent, published in two volumes at Baltimore, in 1919, is a work of superior industry and learning. He has illugtrated every part of the subject by references to the civil law, and to the commentators upon that law, and he has incorporated into the work the leading decisions in our American courts.
BEFORE we enter more at large upon the subject of commercial and maritime law, it may tend to facilitate and enlighten our inquiries, if we take a brief view of the origin, progress, and successive improvements of this branch of legal learning. This will accordingly be attempted in the present lecture.
The marine law of the e United States is the same as the marine law of Europe. It is not the law of a particular country, but the general law of nations; and Lord Mansfield applied to its universal adoption the expressive language of Cicero, when speaking of the eternal laws of justice: Nec erit alia lex Roma, alia Athanis; alia nunc, alia posthac; sed et omnes gentes, et omni tempore una lex et sempiterna, et immortalis continebit.a
In treating of this law, we refer to its pacific character as the law of commerce and navigation in time of peace. The respective rights of belligerents and neutrals in time of war constitute the code of prize law, and that forms a distinct subject of inquiry, which has already been sufficiently discussed in the former volume. When Lord Mansfield mentioned the law of merchants as being a breach of public law, it was because that law did not rest essentially for its character and authority on the positive institutions and local customs of any particular country,
■ Frag, de Repub. lib. 3.
but consisted of certain principles and usages which general convenience, and a common sense of justice had established, to regulate the dealings of merchants and mariners in all the commercial countries of the civilized world. (1.) Of the maritime legislation of the ancients.
Though the marine law of modern Europe has its foundations laid in the jurisprudence of the ancients, there is no certain evidence that either the Phoenicians, Carthaginians, or any of the states of Greece, formed any authoritative digest of naval law. 1 Those powers were distinguished for navigation and commerce, and the Athenians in particular were very commercial, and they kept up a busy intercourse with the Greek colonies in Asia Minor, and on the borders of the Euxine and the Hellespont, in the islands of the Egean sea, and in Sicily and Italy. They were probably the greatest naval power in all antiquity. Themistocles had the sagacity to discern the wonderful influence and controlling ascendancy of naval powIt is stated by Diodorus Siculus, that he persuaded the Athenians to build twenty new ships every year. He established the Piræus as a great commercial emporium and arsenal for Athens, and the cultivation of her naval superiority and glory was his favourite policy; for he held the proposition which Pompey afterwards adopted, that the people who were masters of the sea would be masters of the world. The Athenians encouraged, by their laws, navigation and trade; and there was a particular jurisdiction at Athens for the cognizance of contracts, and controversies between merchants and mariners. There were numerous laws relative to the rights and interests of merchants, and of their navigation; and in many of them there was an endeavour to remove, as much as possible, the process and obstacles which afflicted the operations of commerce. In a pleading of Demosthenes against Lacritus, there is the substance of a loan upon bottomry, with all the provisions and perils appertaining
As a consequence of
to such contract, carefully noted. the commercial spirit and enterprise of the Greeks, their language was spoken throughout all the coasts of the Mediterranean and Euxine seas. Cicero was struck with the comparison between the narrow limits in which the Latin language was confined, and the wide extent of the Greek. The universality and stability of the Greek tongue were owing, no doubt, in a considerable degree, to the conquests of Alexander, to the loquacity of the Greeks, and the inimitable excellence of the language itself; but it is essentially to be imputed to the commercial genius of the people, and to the factories which they established, and the trade and correspondence which they maintained throughout the then known parts of the eastern world.
The Rhodians were the earliest people that actually created, digested, and promulgated a system of marine law. They obtained the sovereignty of the seas about nine hundred years before the Christian era, and were celebrated for their naval power and discipline. Their laws concerning navigation were received at Athens, and in all the islands of the Egean sea, and throughout the coasts of the Mediteranean, as part of the law of nations. Cicero, who in early life studied rethoric at Rhodes, says,c that the power and civil discipline of that republic continued down within his time of memory, in vigour and with glory. We are indebted to the Roman law for all our knowledge of the commercial jurisprudence of the Rhodians. Not only their arts and dominion have perished, but even their nautical laws and usages would have entirely and forever disappeared in the wreck of nations,
a 1 Potter's Greek Antiq. 84. Voyage du jeune Anacharsis, tom. 5. ch. 55. 2 Mitf. Hist. 182—185.
b Græca leguntur in omnibus fere gentibus : Latina suis finibus exiguïs sane, continentur. Orat pro Archia Pocta, s. 10.
a Orat. pro. Lege Manilia. ch. 18.
had it not been for the superior wisdom of their masters, the Romans; and one solitary title in the pandects," contains all the fragments that have floated down to modera times, of their once celebrated maritime code. The collection of laws, under the title of Rhodian laws, published at Basle, in 1561, and at Frankfort, in 1596, were cited as genuine by such civilians as Cujas, Godefroi, Selden, Vinnius, and Gravina; and yet it has since been discovered and declared by equally learned jurists, as Bynkershoeck, Heineccius, Emerigon, and Azuni, that the collection of laws which had been thus recognised as the ancient Rhodian laws, (and of which a translation was given in the collection of sea laws published at London in the reign of Queen Anne,) are not genuine, but spurious. The emperor Augustus first gave a sanction to the laws of the Rhodians, as rules for decision in maritime cases at Rome; and the emperor Antoninus referred one of his subjects, aggrieved by the plunder of his shipwrecked property, to the maritime laws of Rhodes, being the laws which, he said, were the sovereign of the sea. The Rhodian laws, by this authoritative recognition,
c Hist. Jur. Civilis Rom. ac Germ. lib. 1. s. 296.
d Traité des Ass pref.
e Maritime Law of Europe, vol. 1 277 to 235. N. Y. edit. In the note to p. 286, William Johnson, Esq. the learned translator of Azuni, detects many gross errors in the pretended collection of Rhodian laws, contained in the English" complete body of Sea Laws." Mr. Johnson's opinion is, of itself, of great authority; aud his notes to his translation of Azuni, show a familiar and accurate acquaintance with legal and classical antiquities. Yet notwithstanding all the authority against the authenticity of that collection, M. Boulay Paty, in his Cours de Droit Commercial Maritime, tom. 1. p. 10–21. does not hesitate to give a succinct analysis of that collection, as containing at least the sense and spirit of the original laws, and as being an exposition of the true text. f Dig. 14. 2. 9.