...symbolic, then the federal courts cannot recognize it. Compare Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537, 551 (1896) ("We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff's...colored race chooses to put that construction upon it"), with Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483, 494 (1954) ("To separate them from others . . . solely...

...District of Columbia. * * * We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiffs argument to consist hi the assumption that the enforced separation of the...colored race chooses to put that construction upon it. * * * The argument also assumes that social prejudices may be overcome by legislation, and that equal...

...constitutionality of which does not seem to have been questioned, or the corresponding acts of state legislatures. We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff's...colored race chooses to put that construction upon it. The argument necessarily assumes that if, as has been more than once the case,' and is not unlikely...

...the corresponding acts of state legislatures. We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiffs argument to consist in the assumption that the enforced...colored race chooses to put that construction upon it. The argument necessarily assumes that if, as has been more than once the case, and is not unlikely...

...Civil War, statutes were passed se. separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badee of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason...colored race chooses to put that construction upon it. The argument necessarily as-umes that if. as has more than once been the case, and is not unlikely...

...constitutionality of which does not seem to have been questioned, or the corresponding acts of state legislatures. We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff's...solely because the colored race chooses to put that coustruction upon it. The argument necessarily assumes that If, as has been more thau once the case,...

...plaintiff's argument to consist in tbe assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps tbe colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in tbe act, but solely because the co'.ored race cboses to put that construction upon it. The argument...

...constitutionality of which does not seem to have been questioned, or the corresponding acts of state legislatures. We consider the underlying fallacy of the plaintiff's...colored race chooses to put that construction upon it. * * * The argument also assumes that social prejudices may be overcome by legislation, and that equal...

...not seem to have been questioned or the corresponding acts of state legislatures. \Ve consider the fallacy of the plaintiff's argument to consist in...but solely because the colored race chooses to put construction upon it." The only segregation ordinance that has been carried to the supreme court of...

...does not seem to have been questioned or the corresponding acts of state legislatures. We consider the fallacy of the plaintiff's argument to consist in...but solely because the colored race chooses to put construction upon it." The only segregation ordinance that has been carried to the supreme court of...