« AnteriorContinuar »
With portraits of Charles W. Dabney, P. P. Claxton, Albert B. Cummins, James M. Griggs, Joseph W. Babcock, Horace Gray, the late James McMillan, Robert M. La Follette, James F. Smith, John B. Porter, William H. Taft, Thomas O'Gorman, the late Lucas Meyer and Mrs. Meyer, José M. Marroquin, John E. Pillsbury, Francis J. Higginson, Leonard Wood, Arthur MacArthur, Henry C. Corbin, Samuel B. M. Young, Liang Chen Tung, and Tsia Chen, cartoons, and other illustrations.
Record of Current Events.....
With portraits of General Matos, the late Archbishop
Leading Articles of the Month
The Diffusion of Agricultural Prosperity..... 335
A Giant Automobile Harvester at Work...... 337
Fixing" Nitrogen from the Atmosphere.... 338
Collapse of a Great Historical Monument....
Attorney-General Knox, Lawyer..
By Henry C. Adams.
Thomas A. Edison at Home..
The Pacific Cable Routes..
The First Public Man Interviewed in England. 362
TERMS: $2.50 a year in a lvance; 25 cents a number. Foreign postage $1.00 a year additional. Subscribers may remit to us by post-office or express money orders, or by bank checks, drafts, or registered letters. Money in letters is at senders' risk. Renew as early as possible, in order to avoid a break in the receipt of the numbers. Bookdealers, Postmasters, and Newsdealers receive subscriptions. (Subscriptions to the English REVIEW OF REVIEWS, which is edited and published by Mr. W. T. Stead in London, may be sent to this office, and orders for single copies can also be filled, at the price of $2.50 for the yearly subscription, including postage, or 25 cents for single copies.) THE REVIEW OF REVIEWS CO., 13 Astor Place, New York City.
The Australian prime minister and Sir John Forrest, Minister of Defense, sailed from London for New York on August 20, for a visit to the United States.
Review of Reviews.
NEW YORK, SEPTEMBER, 1902.
THE PROGRESS OF THE WORLD.
With Congressional elections pending, and State campaigns on foot in Season. many of our commonwealths, the people of the United States, nevertheless, were evidently much more interested last month in other things than they were in party politics. As we have frequently remarked, this country is fortunate enough at present not to be greatly distracted by those bitter prejudices and fierce rivalries of party-amounting almost literally to warfare that are inevitable certainly at periods in a nation's career, but that ought not to be perpetual. Nothing could be more obvious than that the country is well satisfied with President Roosevelt's conduct during his first twelve months as Chief Magistrate. It will be one year, on the 14th of the present month, since President McKinley's tragic death at Buffalo, and the administering of the oath of office to his successor. Mr. Roosevelt has fulfilled all reasonable expectations. He has shown marvelous adaptability in every direction, has given untiring industry to the varied details of his great office, and has borne the strain with unfailing physical vigor and imperturbable good temper.
He has stood strongly for the poli A Year cies which he believed to be wise of Roosevelt. and right for the country, without any sacrifice of agreeable personal relations with all the leaders of his own party, and, in fact, with all public men of whatever affiliation. His appointments have been felicitous, and, in general, highly praised. He holds the good will of the Democratic South almost as completely as of the Republican Northwest. He is persona grata in New England, and is idolized west of the Missouri River. He maintains good relations with the party leaders of New York and Pennsylvania, and has the hearty approval of the plain people of those great States. That he will be renominated in 1904 is now considered to be even more probable than was Mr. McKinley's renomination in the middle of his first
Never, indeed, since the early days of the Republic has it appeared so likely that a President would be his own successor. This, of course, in a sense pertains to 1904 rather than to 1902. But it is well to appreciate the fact that this remarkable popularity of the President, and this quite general approval of the administration as a whole, form a very important element in the political atmosphere that surrounds the electoral situation this fall. The politicians have their own all-powerful reasons for partisan effort; but people at large, being pretty well satisfied with things as they are, and having no political objects of their own at stake, are rather indifferent than otherwise, through sheer contentment and preoccupation. The great Repub. lican argument of the year will be the advisability of letting well enough alone. It would be strange if the Democratic party should not regain something of its normal strength in Congress; but it is scarcely to be believed that the pendulum will swing so far back as to put the opposition party in control of the House.
Next to the widespread feeling of conBumper Crops and fidence in President Roosevelt and the Prosperity. administration, the best reliance of the Republicans for success this year will lie in the marvelously prosperous state of our agriculture and industry. It is now certain that the crops of 1902 are to exceed in quantity and value those of any previous year in our history. Last year the corn crop, which was a partial failure, amounted to 1,522,500,000 bushels, the average of the ten preceding years having been about 2,000,000,000 bushels. Last year, therefore, the corn crop was only three-quarters of the normal yield. This year it is admitted on all hands that the crop will be at least 1,000,000,000 bushels greater than last year, and Bradstreet's declared in the middle of August that there is a prospect of 1,250,000,000 more bushels of corn being raised than a year ago." In our judgment, it is not at all unlikely that the corn crop may
THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LIBRARIES
exceed 2,800,000,000 bushels. Much the largest previous corn crop was that of 1896, which amounted to a little less than 2,284,000,000 bushels. Last year's corn brought a high price, so that those farmers who were fortunate enough to have a crop made a great deal of money. But it needs little demonstration to make it plain that a generally abundant yield at lower prices contributes more to the general prosperity than a scanty yield at proportionately high prices. One of the results of a billion bushels of extra corn must be to lower the price of meat. The defense of the great beef-supply companies against the charges of extortionate prices has been the shortage of the corn crop. This excuse now disappears, and the retail butchers ought before long to be obtaining their stock at the old prices.
The smaller corn crop of last year The Wheat was counterbalanced by the extraor Yield of 1902. dinary yield of wheat, much the greatest on record. The wheat crop of 1901 amounted to nearly 750,000,000 bushels. Four hundred and fifty million bushels has generally been considered an average American wheat crop. Only twice before last year had the crop exceeded 600,000,000,-namely, in 1891, when it was 612,000,000, and in 1898, when it was
IN THIS WHEAT BY AND BY!
(Expectant Europe and the American harvest.)
In 1899 it was 547,000,000, and in 1900 a little more than 522,000,000. The New York Times last month, rejecting the Government estimates of this summer's wheat yield, was of the opinion that it might be nearly or quite as great as that of last year. A contributor to this number of the REVIEW, Mr. William R. Draper, estimates it at fully 700,000,000 bushels, which we do not believe at all too high. Improved methods of farming in the United States have made wheat both a surer and a more prolific crop than it was some years ago. Like corn, it enters importantly into the agricultural production of nearly all the States. The crop is divided about evenly between winter and spring wheat. Northern Texas now grows wheat in abundance.
The South was busily engaged last The New Cot- month in picking, baling, and marketing the new cotton crop. Early in the season the prospects had been favorable for the largest and finest crop ever grown. Considerable damage was done in some localities, as the crop was maturing, by unfavorable conditions of weather. But with reports and estimates somewhat conflicting as these comments were written, there was a chance that the output might reach almost 12,000,000 bales, as against an average for the previous four years of about 10,500,000. Our Southern cotton crop has doubled in twenty years, thus showing a very much larger relative gain than the wheat and corn of the West, each of which has, roughly speaking, increased by about 50 per cent. in two decades.
These three great crops by no means Sources of exhaust the list of those products Farm Wealth. which make up our current agricultural wealth. The oat crop of 1902 is the largest we have ever had, and may amount to from 850,000,000 to 900,000,000 bushels. although this particular cereal is not enough in demand to justify a vast increase of acreage, we shall, doubtless, within two or three years, be producing an average of a thousand million bushels of oats per year. The barley crop is estimated at about 120,000,000 bushels, as against an average for some years past of perhaps 70,000,000. The volume and value of pasturage and hay are more difficult to estimate than some of the other crops, but undoubtedly these have been considerably greater this year than ever before. The grass crop for the most part finds its way to the market in the form of dairy products, wool, beef and mutton, hogs, horses, and mules. The number of farm animals and the value of marketable animal products of the farm have increased by about 100 per cent. in twenty years.
We publish else
Intelligence and Prosperity. Where some in
teresting agricultural statistics compiled by Mr. William R. Draper, entitled "The Farmer's Balance Sheet for 1902," and a brief article on "The Diffusion of Agricultural Prosperity," from the pen of the distinguished political economist, Prof. Henry C. Adams, of the University of Michigan. Prof. Adams' analysis will bear very careful study, for it contains some profound underlying truths. Nothing could be a greater mistake than to take a purely materialistic view of the prevalence of prosperity in the United States at the present time. Moral and intellectual conditions, forming the essence of our civilization, are at the basis of all this agricultural development and industrial progress. The growth and diffusion of wealth in the United States would have been absolutely impossible but for the maintenance of our democratic ideals. The value is not, after all, in the crops, but in the man who produces them, who owns the land, who receives the income, and who expends it for the advancement of himself and his family in rational ways, that also benefit the neighborhood and the country. Intelligence is what makes American farming prosperous. We beg to call attention to another article in this number of the REVIEW from a Western contributor, Mr. Matson, on Improved Conditions in the American Farmer's Life." With mortgages paid off, and a sense of freedom and prosperity, the typical farmer of the West is asserting his rightful place as the proprietor of an estate and as a well-established citizen of a great country. He is improvHe is improv ing his farm buildings; grading up his live stock; learning from the authorities of his State agricultural college and from the Farmers' Institute of his county more and more about scientific agriculture; and providing for his family more and more of the luxuries of life that are enjoyed by the banker and the successful merchant or professional man in the county town.
The farmer is, furthermore, as Mr. Neighborhood Matson shows, turning his attention to Life. the improvement of neighborhood conditions, so that country life may not be too
irksome for his children. While free rural delivery of the mails is by no means universal as yet, the telephone is found in almost every farming neighborhood of the country. What Mr. Matson says about the progress of the movement for consolidating country schools is worthy of attention; and this is a subject to which we shall in future numbers of the REVIEW recur with particular attention and emphasis, for it is a matter of profound significance. In the towns there have been vast strides during the last quarter of a century in public-school equipment and instruction, while until very lately the old-fashioned district schools of the rural neighborhoods had been either at a standstill or were positively retrograding. Under the new impulse there is to be not merely a radical, but a revolutionary change in country schools. The diminutive "red schoolhouse" of the North and the log-cabin school of the South have about served their day. Something vastly better and more modern is easily within reach of thousands of rural neighborhoods.
The new mandate that has gone forth Consolidating is to the effect that neighboring districts must consolidate in order to build a good central school building, with several rooms and several teachers, and a consequent opportunity for grading the scholars. It is further decreed that the children must be brought to this central school on a coöperative plan, in