 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909 - 790 páginas
...common benefit therefrom, the corporation quoad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of...whom the like special franchises had been conferred." Although it was said in Davidson v. Hine, that " a municipal fire department is indistinguishable from... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1874 - 664 páginas
...common benefit therefrom, the corporation quoad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of...whom the like special franchises had been conferred." In San Francisco Gas Company v. San Francisco, 9 Cal., 433, it is held that in providing light for... | |
 | Murray Hoffman - 1853 - 456 páginas
...common benefit therefrom, the Corporation, so far, is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of...whom the like special franchises had been conferred. It is upon the like distinction that municipal corporations, in their private character as owners and... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - 1858 - 714 páginas
...defendants quoad hoc were to be regarded as a private company." He says : i: It [the corporation] stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchise had been conferred," and cites a large number of authorities on the point. This decision... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1867 - 732 páginas
...respect to the powers conferred by these laws, is to be regarded as a private corporation, standing on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom like privileges had been conferred. Or, in the language of the court in Bailey v. The JUayor, £e.,... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1868 - 776 páginas
...benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of...persons upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred.1 " Suppose the legislature, instead of the franchise in question, had conferred upon the... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1905 - 922 páginas
...common benefit therefrom, the corporation quoad hac is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of...whom the like special franchises had been conferred." In that case, the plaintiff sued for the negligent construction of a dam across the Croton river by... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1874 - 904 páginas
...beneftt therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of...persons upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred.i " Suppose the legislature, instead of the franchise in question, had conferred upon the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1877 - 748 páginas
...public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation, quoad hoc, stands on the same footing as any .individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchises have been conferred. Trustees of Dartmouth College v/ Woodward, supra; Philips v. Berry, 1 Ld. Raym.... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1878 - 1032 páginas
...benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of...whom the like special franchises had been conferred. 1 " Suppose the legislature, instead of the franchise in question, had conferred upon the defendants... | |
| |
... exclusively, they belong to the corporate body' in its public, political, or municipal character. But if the grant was for purposes of private advantage and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quoad... 
