Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

PREFACE.

All who give special attention to the subject of railroads in their relations to the public, are intently watching Illinois. This is alike true, whether railways are considered from a legal, an economic or a political point of view. The present constitution and recent railway legislation of the State, together with the decision of the Supreme Court based thereon, explain and abundantly justify this prominence. It is obvious that while, in its leading features, the common carrier law is substantially the same as administered in the different States, yet there are many points of diversity, as the result both of legislation and judicial decision. Those special features in this State are of such a nature as to make Illinois the pathfinder in the present effort to readjust the carrying trade of the country. This treatise is largely the result of investigations prosecuted with no thought of book-making. The writer has constant occasion, in the performance of his daily work, to state some phase of railway law, and has often found it necessary to consult many authorities in ascertaining positively the correct answer to what might seem to be a very simple question. Throughout these pages scrupulous care has been taken to avoid blending mere personal opinions with the authoritative utterances of the judiciary, and the exact limitations of the written law. Great caution

has been observed to prevent errors. The author's object will have been attained and his labors abundantly rewarded if the result shall prove of service in lessening the work of determining with exactitude what is railway law in Illinois, and contribute in some degree to a better understanding and adjustment of the relations which the railroads of the country sustain in law, and should sustain in fact, to the people. F. G.

CHICAGO, Oct. 15, 1873.

[blocks in formation]

American Merchants' Union Express Co. v. Schier.

174

Attorney General v. Birmingham and Derby Junc. R. R. Co. 256

[blocks in formation]

Baker v. Michigan Southern and Northern Indiana R. R.Co. 175

[blocks in formation]

Bartholomew v. St. Louis, Jacksonville and Chicago R.R.Co. 167

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Bloodgood v. Mohawk and Hudson R. R. Co.....

Boston and Lowell R. R. Co. v. Salem and Lowell R. R. Co. 255

.93, 301

[blocks in formation]

Cathcart v. Fire Department of N. Y...

Caterham Railway Co.......

Central Military Tract R. R. Co. v. Rockafellow

Central v. Collins...

Champlin v. Morgan...

Chase v. Sycamore and Courtland R. R. Co.

301

256

189

64, 65

65

44

[blocks in formation]

Chicago and Alton R. R. Co. v. Randolph

v. Roberts

v. Scott

v. Shannon

v. Utley

Chicago and Aurora R. R. Co. v. Thompson_

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. Co. v. Dewey.

161, 168

158

176

158, 303

195

155, 164

190

[blocks in formation]

Chicago, Danville and Vincennes R. R. Co. v. Smith
Chicago and Mississippi R. R. Co. v. Dunbar
v. Patchin
Chicago and Northwestern R. R. Co. v. Ames.

88, 258 172

125, 178, 198

177

[blocks in formation]

Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. R. Co. v. Otto

163, 178

159

[blocks in formation]

128

Chicago and Milwaukee R. R. Co. v. Bull
Cincinnati, Wilmington and Janesville R. R. Co. v. Com.... 93
City of Chicago v. Evans..

[blocks in formation]

50

129

129

139

301

300

86

257, 307

263

246

65

74

« AnteriorContinuar »