Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

Question 2) Continued

12

13,14 15

No

16

17

Have 32 channel spectrum analyzer and 1024 channel autocorrelator.

Planned: 1024 autocorrelator with minimum channel width of 200Hz

Planned: 50 channel 10kHz bandwidth filter.

Question 3)

Could astronomical research benefit from simultaneous multi-channel analyzers with 106 to 109 channels of 1Hz

width? Comments?

Respondent:

#1,2,3,

4,5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Yes

For most spectroscopy 1kHz resolution is sufficient; the more channels the better.

100-yes

109-don't know

Yes

106-109 channels would over resolve spectral features

Yes

Do not forsee uses for such high frequency
Possible, but expensive

No astronomical need for frequency resolution 100Hz.
100Hz seems to be smallest bandwidth useful for studies
of known natural processes.

Question 4)

Comment on the present state of the art of such systems. What characteristics would you require? How would you proceed to achieve them? What directions of development seem to you to offer most promise?

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

14

Feasible, using autocorrelators

-

Achieve very narrow resolution through use of autocorrelation
spectrometer.

Autocorrelators or multifilters for 1-100mhz total coverage.
Acousto-optical or multifilter techniques for larger coverage

Increase the usefulness of such a spectrometer if it could
be split into several parallel receivers.
Optical data most promising approach.

13 Working continuously on fine time resolution from weak signals after removing interstellar dispersion. Autocorrelator techniques to achieve such large capacity. Problem with 106-109 multi channel analyzers is the drift of the center of frequency of each channel; shouldn't exceed 20.1 Hz.

15

16

17

For VLA spectral-line back end, a system is contemplated
which would have ~2x105 channels divided among the 351
interferometer pairs.

2 approaches

a) coherent optical processing method
b) Fast Fourier Transform algorithm.

Question 5)

If such an analyzer were made available to you would you consider using it, via an IF tap or with spare receivers, to "hitch a ride" for coherent signal search during normal observing time?

[blocks in formation]

8

9

Best to use antennas with large collecting area.
Possibly

10,11,12

13

14

Yes

Concerning technical improvements in pulsar observations: versatile very fast digital processing unit to perform the dispersion removal over wide bandwidths.

Yes

[blocks in formation]

Have you ever engaged in any search for coherent or
"intelligent" signals at your facilities?
If so, please
estimate the total hours used. Have the results been
Was the search a by-product of other obser-

reported?

vations? Explain.

[blocks in formation]

17

3 searches:

No

a) OZMA/Drake

b) Verschuur

c) Palmer and Zuckerman (unpublished)

Search for electromagneitc pulses from the galactic center.

Yes

No

Yes; searching for narrow-band radiation near the hydrogen line.

247-831 O 78 15

COMPLEMENTARY DOCUMENT 11

THE SOVIET CETI REPORT

« AnteriorContinuar »